From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71904219F1 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772466806; cv=none; b=pj2q3PwhIqTlBUcd4D/QR+TKLE9TID7Z4BvZIDLqzlt4mMimyCguNXwhbxUtmN75iS0hnuS1Oe9BLffuT4vbkBwLRm5JT0SRTtNdq7vEclX+6rBSolDCabWGFrgn0zbgp05gr7+9BFPWln/QZxYcwLXlV/GZ2GDNi6eQxas5uWQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772466806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3lki4m9ACKTljBn/+/7u9CsGZfEzbpHbNhJXjkcTkjk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sQmzqDAwZahHS8Hxv9dz1UHCQYlTRcmG1a+dH1fJzfklvD9ATtiWVV6iyY8p7nh5lHvbCscliTL8SlQvDS8GY74391rqdHvMc5uOQypYc+vI/KVDKVpe2XM0aSQycL8I1+ASgW9j4F5W/LzWPer9R81hj9nErnU4D04GUcQkChY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BcUfmaeP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BcUfmaeP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6324DC4AF09; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 15:53:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772466806; bh=3lki4m9ACKTljBn/+/7u9CsGZfEzbpHbNhJXjkcTkjk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BcUfmaePhUuQIb2wan2ORwktOm/ZgZJ7adnrXIJRgycKCLR5oBeSvgIl+EdBUN9Sr 8o0mOfDJe18L+dCP+ZkJqriPU/YPu+zQNAUFgUL9DAXNEmhxMVXWwCO//OyqN5hFge PSd3hWgDxvzZNoYuweubq4uI1ohATzcXQarPuyoTmpM20YNlMkrOWBFNUrNrVhh4u2 xqyra5voehnCKfmA8m5O6B2213BSSdVgmSsPgnAG4p7NuYQ0o5/H0fIyg3XDRBRYeB jDvMXikNBc953EiOQHLn1ZrSSFadZDwrZEOMVKfVmE9N05ufwXQefpD7ofO6bEgWqf jnF5Y7lApuvdg== Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 08:53:22 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Sungwoo Kim Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Mike Christie , "Martin K. Petersen" , Hannes Reinecke , Chao Shi , Weidong Zhu , Dave Tian , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: fix memory allocation in nvme_pr_read_keys() Message-ID: References: <20260228001927.382810-3-iam@sung-woo.kim> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260228001927.382810-3-iam@sung-woo.kim> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 07:19:28PM -0500, Sungwoo Kim wrote: > nvme_pr_read_keys() takes num_keys from userspace and uses it to > calculate the allocation size for rse via struct_size(). The upper > limit is PR_KEYS_MAX (64K). > > A malicious or buggy userspace can pass a large num_keys value that > results in a 4MB allocation attempt at most, causing a warning in > the page allocator when the order exceeds MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Thanks, applied to nvme-7.0.