mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	<weijiang.yang@intel.com>, <john.allen@amd.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<xin3.li@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
	Vignesh Balasubramanian <vigbalas@amd.com>,
	Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Differentiate default features for host and guest FPUs
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:18:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaac7044-5c65-4d96-9e00-815b90be56e6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318153316.1970147-5-chao.gao@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2762 bytes --]

On 3/18/2025 8:31 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
> 
> @@ -807,9 +811,11 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(unsigned int legacy_size)
>   	/* Clean out dynamic features from default */
>   	fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features;
>   	fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
> +	fpu_kernel_cfg.guest_default_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
>   
>   	fpu_user_cfg.default_features = fpu_user_cfg.max_features;
>   	fpu_user_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
> +	fpu_user_cfg.guest_default_features = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;

And you'll add up this on patch7:

   + /* Clean out guest-only features from default */
   + fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_SUPERVISOR_GUEST;


I'm not sure this overall hunk is entirely clear.


Taking a step back, we currently define three types of xfeature sets:

   1. 'default_features'     in a task-inlined buffer
   2. 'max_features'         in an extended buffer
   3. 'independent_features' in a separate buffer (only for LBR)

The VCPU fpstate has so far followed (1) and (2). Now, since we're 
introducing divergence at (1), you've named it guest_default_features:

   'default_features' < 'guest_default_features' < 'max_features'

I don’t see a strong reason against introducing this new field, as 
'guest' already implies the VCPU state. However, rather than directly 
modifying or extending struct fpu_state_config — which may not align 
well with VCPU FPU properties — a dedicated struct could provide a 
cleaner and more structured alternative:

   struct vcpu_fpu_config {
     unsigned int size;
     unsigned int user_size;
     u64 features;
     u64 user_features;
   } guest_default_cfg;

This struct would make VCPU-specific state handling clearer:

   (1) Guest permission setup:

        /* Set the guest default permission */
        fpu->guest_perm.__state_perm      = guest_default_cfg.features;
        fpu->guest_perm.__state_size      = guest_default_cfg.size;
        fpu->guest_perm.__user_state_size = guest_default_cfg.user_size;

   (2) VCPU allocation time:

        fpstate->size           = guest_default_cfg.size;
        fpstate->user_size      = guest_default_cfg.user_size;
        fpstate->xfeatures      = guest_default_cfg.features;
        fpstate->user_xfeatures = guest_default_cfg.user_features;

These assignments considerably make the code more readable.

With that, going back to the default settings, perhaps refactoring it 
could be an option to improve clarity in distinguishing guest vs. host 
settings.

See the attached diff file. I thought this restructuring could make the 
logic more explicit and highlight the differences between guest and host 
settings.

Thanks,
Chang

[-- Attachment #2: guest_default.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2350 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
index 40621ee4d65b..d2f7ce45d4de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
@@ -702,6 +702,11 @@ static int __init init_xstate_size(void)
 	fpu_user_cfg.default_size =
 		xstate_calculate_size(fpu_user_cfg.default_features, false);
 
+	guest_default_cfg.size =
+		xstate_calculate_size(guest_default_cfg.features, compacted);
+	guest_default_cfg.user_size =
+		xstate_calculate_size(guest_default_cfg.user_features, false);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -730,6 +735,30 @@ static void __init fpu__init_disable_system_xstate(unsigned int legacy_size)
 	fpstate_reset(&current->thread.fpu);
 }
 
+static void __init init_default_features(u64 kernel_max_features, u64 user_max_features)
+{
+	u64 kfeatures = kernel_max_features;
+	u64 ufeatures = user_max_features;
+
+	/*
+	 * Default feature sets should not include dynamic and guest-only
+	 * xfeatures at all:
+	 */
+	kfeatures &= ~(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC | XFEATURE_MASK_GUEST_SUPERVISOR);
+	ufeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
+
+	fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features = kfeatures;
+	fpu_user_cfg.default_features   = ufeatures;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure VCPU FPU container only reserves a space for
+	 * guest-exclusive xfeatures. This distinction can save kernel
+	 * memory by maintaining a necessary amount of XSAVE buffer.
+	 */
+	guest_default_cfg.features      = kfeatures | xfeatures_mask_guest_supervisor();
+	guest_default_cfg.user_features = ufeatures;
+}
+
 /*
  * Enable and initialize the xsave feature.
  * Called once per system bootup.
@@ -801,12 +830,8 @@ void __init fpu__init_system_xstate(unsigned int legacy_size)
 	fpu_user_cfg.max_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features;
 	fpu_user_cfg.max_features &= XFEATURE_MASK_USER_SUPPORTED;
 
-	/* Clean out dynamic features from default */
-	fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features;
-	fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
-
-	fpu_user_cfg.default_features = fpu_user_cfg.max_features;
-	fpu_user_cfg.default_features &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC;
+	/* Now, given maximum feature set, determin default values: */
+	init_default_features(fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features, fpu_user_cfg.max_features);
 
 	/* Store it for paranoia check at the end */
 	xfeatures = fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 15:31 [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce CET supervisor state support Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Always preserve non-user xfeatures/flags in __state_perm Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:17   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-01 17:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU container Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:16   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-02  1:56     ` Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Add CET supervisor xfeature support Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:15   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-02  2:28     ` Chao Gao
2025-04-02 21:37     ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-03 13:26       ` Chao Gao
2025-04-03 14:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Differentiate default features for host and guest FPUs Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:18   ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2025-04-02  3:16     ` Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] x86/fpu: Initialize guest FPU permissions from guest defaults Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container " Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce "guest-only" supervisor xfeature set Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:16   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-02  4:29     ` Chao Gao
2025-03-18 15:31 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Warn if guest-only supervisor states are detected in normal fpstate Chao Gao
2025-04-01 17:17   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-02 14:30     ` Chao Gao
2025-04-04  0:02       ` Chang S. Bae
2025-04-04  1:06         ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-01 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce CET supervisor state support Chang S. Bae
2025-04-02 21:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-04-02 21:35   ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-02 21:44     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaac7044-5c65-4d96-9e00-815b90be56e6@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levymitchell0@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vigbalas@amd.com \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®