From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C231741CF for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721051755; cv=none; b=bViqSrhg+kXKaxc2TBGZWm0UrQ8pkhExGatk4m4bIg2GMe7xQLsINDVTngyX2a68cxMpaFPvFukiudaAldF3G/QQix1YByTDSoKp/EgmtbPZwtXD8aWhTtDjIPKFE2rbFQ6nJsZb5lDswhdWf1KDpG3QGyT17u8fiUV0oQb0p7E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721051755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o7SPAJO8iOMaSTIdeOb07rqXUTWi+XHsVu4Xl9ncQP0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=PFxp+lJYX5q8xYhmF4l/YduvzHifhrKUvDHyS6yMXHn1af+qw5ckExICQMAugxRZXxp0zL7hI5WY5fbnu/HdPbi+ycuB30CSTy67rJJYz9nQ5ivhq9Hnd+zex529lRFA34zhMI61HkxXK0KRN1ynTAOPzN+i2La38UB2hhDdXS4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEC2DA7; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.77.136] (unknown [10.57.77.136]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 116DD3F766; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:55:49 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: mTHP stats for pagecache folio allocations Content-Language: en-GB To: kernel test robot , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Jonathan Corbet , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , David Hildenbrand , Barry Song , Lance Yang , Baolin Wang Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240711072929.3590000-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <202407130620.DbyYULnj-lkp@intel.com> From: Ryan Roberts In-Reply-To: <202407130620.DbyYULnj-lkp@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/07/2024 23:44, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] > [also build test ERROR on next-20240712] > [cannot apply to linus/master v6.10-rc7] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/mm-Cleanup-count_mthp_stat-definition/20240711-154455 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711072929.3590000-3-ryan.roberts%40arm.com > patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: mTHP stats for pagecache folio allocations > config: arm64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130620.DbyYULnj-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130620.DbyYULnj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407130620.DbyYULnj-lkp@intel.com/ > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): [...] >>> ERROR: modpost: "mthp_stats" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! I'm assuming this last line is the problem one? I can't reproduce this following your instructions and I can't see any issue based on inspection. Is it possible this is a false positive? Thanks, Ryan