From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, derosier@gmail.com,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:59:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aabedbd547708a52b8bf8e0d10ba10e994acb54f.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com>
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 09:48 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Bean,
>
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:10:43 +0200
> Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Richard
> > would you please help us confirm below question??
>
> Miquel suggested an approach that would allow us to deal with both
> JFFS2
> and UBI/UBIFS without having any FS/wear-leveling specific code at
> the
> NAND level, but you decided to ignore his comments. Sorry but there's
> nothing we can do to help you if you don't listen to our
> recommendations.
Expose this issue to FS layer, it is not good idea. that will impact
more code, and involve duplicated code.
>
> I've been quite disappointed by your behavior in the past, and it
> continues. Recently you've taken Miquel's patches and claimed
> ownership
did you seem my recent patch? you can ignore that see this.
> on them (probably not intentionally, but still) while you were
> clearly
> unable to rework your original series the way I suggested (which
> Miquel
> did after seeing you would never send new versions).
seriously?
> And when Miquel
> suggested a change to the implementation he had done based on the
> discussion we had with Richard, you decided to ignore it and pursue
> in
> the original direction. So, quite frankly, I'm really not convinced
> you
> can conduct such a change.
>
As Miquel mentioned, we need richard's final comfirmation,
If he agrees with this proposal, I give up my current patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-02 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-25 12:18 Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] mtd: rawnand: group all NAND specific ops into new nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] mtd: rawnand: Add {pre, post}_erase hooks in nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] mtd: rawnand: Add write_oob hook " Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] mtd: rawnand: Introduce a new function nand_check_is_erased_page() Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] mtd: rawnand: micron: Micron SLC NAND filling block Bean Huo
2020-05-28 14:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] " Bean Huo
2020-06-01 21:10 ` Bean Huo
2020-06-02 7:05 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-06-02 7:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-06-02 8:59 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2020-06-02 11:53 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aabedbd547708a52b8bf8e0d10ba10e994acb54f.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=derosier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome