From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CA92DEA6B; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 18:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775067915; cv=none; b=LoUMm/HTSPUTuXURUFKRCfv9TCzThaCyemQHmZWiGMFhGQl5WYrqjfC/0NClHXYSyUmrSRfaXhxLBUW8dkgEV3svkWaU4fyAyblMSDS6CN07dgDHovmaobJ3I/aj9eCOn/+tcVHfePvgOJ9GbyUuXv+EULopfRREfPVLgjtpACE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775067915; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ov7en0F5vhrHqMYnwN3HLGogkYj9PTJvucXIRbisf4s=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=szNfdmn2cqPCeOFiBFSOWqptp1gYgrfdNXYrldZSmmHLiRy0kVFTIG+FLH14mMXfD8LmWo0Eb5Q1Tddb9KzO7GUXErEPfVmUm4UdIAktuxU2Y9Gnx14fYhlNLXngFOVHMV1p6JWy0/+veY9LNW7BtSaiqqYU8/O1CJ8G2qz1u7U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=aNe3NffC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="aNe3NffC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=lzO/vA3FzH4/6916VeynP5KzZVYZFOeKExWewndmyAI=; b=aNe3NffCp3rijpW7uckt/MRKtj M82EvWCXc4RCij3sLFxUK3DqNRjHiJWSiQmsXfelswk3u73A1qGMoz59Lo4/3tXOSAJs/VQmr97B3 ltvdrztQBqCsOnd9zrda0pn/iyr1NqTbVAPdnUm/FGmPJEa411Y6Bsm5wtPdUAhl32wYFj37m8m47 rcRVwEKskLLNKIxqI9a/PJYBuOPkltYfKVGFPWqERnWBe4dz30VWY0IF4jnRGVO/unZKxxdnlnyna PC8kYB9D1U8NzB7EsbR8Kjd6CsEQYez8lbdnmJI4Fgjyo0Vqc+FWPBtvouGzOsijME9J1eEWhnrlS /KMJ+oNw==; Received: from [50.53.43.113] (helo=[192.168.254.34]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w80FY-0000000FxNP-2AWC; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 18:25:08 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 11:25:07 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: Add CPU Isolation documentation To: Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Gabriele Monaco , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , Marcelo Tosatti , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , "Paul E . McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Phil Auld , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , Vlastimil Babka , Waiman Long , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Bagas Sanjaya References: <20260326140055.41555-1-frederic@kernel.org> <6d113021-6208-4dcc-a209-a2317d680e3f@infradead.org> <20260401130855.02c161d8@gandalf.local.home> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <20260401130855.02c161d8@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/1/26 10:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 18:27:03 +0200 > Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >>>> +"CPU Isolation" means leaving a CPU exclusive to a given workload >>>> +without any undesired code interference from the kernel. >>>> + >>>> +Those interferences, commonly pointed out as "noise", can be triggered >>> >>> nit: "noise," >> >> Thanks! I have applied all your suggestions, except this one for now because I don't >> really understand the typo rule behind. Any hint? > > So this looks to be an American English thing (placing commas within the > quote), but from what I read, British English places the comma outside the > quote. > > Here's one case I much rather go the British English way. This also means > it's only incorrect to Americans ;-) Yes, just leave it as is. -- ~Randy