From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D877B2E06EA for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2026 18:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772737147; cv=none; b=hSJkHbQqkeW8ltsZMNvUz+QQ1pcUY2txnqFBQDbIww6vCSy9g469nCBLOEufsVy2RUXC0+KCYBw4HKriBcQiwiB+TEKrPtskdzPIkQU7EpXE3Gt0k4HbZu+IwB6pzj3vlWACf1f8LbS1S5q5LDU0VZwtYyv7IR705zr3BywJ6Ck= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772737147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ldi2xj3Wt82MNVAjUv4VLJ2IUzbzkeaaW86d6yvdw6M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Dq6CUF9LGTJmp/PgPkf8t3WBKXzHtdoaVTC7zaC0teAB/ErmpEr7F4QhJdWF99lqwbAlpcXuqBe8GGkN7S1Pht1d9ZXngzU14vBo2kkymrmO0VgeJbhOaFHp/l30c4G27zOIYgcETqH2d/er2sjWkXqfMYJkW0cpmIkc50oZCVI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=VplKmPXG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="VplKmPXG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=ldi2 xj3Wt82MNVAjUv4VLJ2IUzbzkeaaW86d6yvdw6M=; b=VplKmPXGJQZxHJPDQfLy hvzvWObOIyp9cZ+S8shxcjF6m2YXirs7KO1QmyyPpOBoys+0YKeZSnSSLwGYOta+ NOoRsL/mIOl+9CIQuBXr730I5PkFzUibquDcoHeqYbpQOtuVbdh0GV+3lE7Tq1pN G5dtT7ralC7k+8i4apwJ+qoGUxXA5UGjA+mz5mzfBNdHBETr63PMMDWiDGUm0Lxu Ja1CRbIQT/lRwCDifgdNOQ1oVtC4vAbpVVFUGSimpM7fUP3g0a9rgoNyDezUUu9B E5kY+LEs5wpG8fy4C84OEArbZyXiUr74S2453C0gfWcMd6jpM/OZEaCUzwtPSiwZ YQ== Received: (qmail 1302348 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2026 19:59:00 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 Mar 2026 19:59:00 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@eCSMh0tMSNMujns5 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:59:00 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mailbox: test: really ignore optional memory resources Message-ID: References: <20260303212738.12769-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KAhyjUyuZBE5sbcs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260303212738.12769-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --KAhyjUyuZBE5sbcs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 10:27:39PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Memory resources are optional but if the resource is empty > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() prints an error nonetheless. > Refactor the code to check the resources locally first and process them > only if they are present. The -EBUSY error message of ioremap_resource() > is still kept because it is correct. The comment which explains that a > plain ioremap() is tried as a workaround is turned into a info message. > So, a user will be informed about it, too. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Got some buildbot reports about missing __iomem annotations. I already fixed these and now wait for the updated buildbot reports. Sorry, because of the new 7.0-rc1 requirement to use top-of-tree sparse, my scripts went a bit haywire. --KAhyjUyuZBE5sbcs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmmp0nAACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaJvg/7B39mtyBr+6y2AKUfMsYP6GjGZ8rm8wH27Mg9U30W65eIQwYix6SBH31j 2YCAvk3/cMZuxP5S2QnEAxCYSEHe5WthbO1mqLQd2yOE6yA5DR6/DskM2qL8k0SZ hiTBzmlx1gEmdtK+7Gjlj/C0Zl7atqUuD9wMU6pdBGAwlfTcRjr1PxTwKyUX//Ld SbkyFEJMGTvcZ/zu1GmThOgds0ltvq9nL+uPyBbYzup6uslQSWsxL40DCjJHHCN7 j3z/cNIx0duIIrrp04lpnUlpIDkNDA3q2zhj2JrgLh2d39rm4VK8NHI64JNiiFl2 bp7LBhHQdsbqK/ITBqcm+DR//EMg3x10h7m1Vac4cND0dnZZpXEjZW37MRkoDR+f 49cVzG7AiTedhANfWLtuaeXOAoF3H0xMNPH70LmpsX5HQ8uGjcd88sh1bf68Fdlv UU3/YuzzLqkn1pL9uTnV/ZqPT5S+eZxlTaY8uXMSS2Wz5uRCcgeFYIyiWMEo+0ri 3FK4D+1FEylns4TTyRq9UOBbXuNMpdT1nyWNKSv2HjKy78o7Zh+E2JJjRFtQVRLg eoVvEw1KNH8wnpUm0WaZZaZlxKIxIF2YoAlGvyQzApj4+kSagypI5xd6RfYhb61n Fwcv6sgd7oytKj8629LjjIr8FHrTSc4kBtkDzXimKDv6ty7MkiM= =35AH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KAhyjUyuZBE5sbcs--