Re: [PATCH] vfs: remove externs from fs.h on functions modified by i_ino widening

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 08:27:01AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> @@ -2951,26 +2951,26 @@ struct inode *iget5_locked(struct super_block *, u64,
>  struct inode *iget5_locked_rcu(struct super_block *, u64,
>  			       int (*test)(struct inode *, void *),
>  			       int (*set)(struct inode *, void *), void *);
> -extern struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *, u64);
> +struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *, u64);

I think plain 'u64' deserves a name.  I know some people get very
upset when they see any unnamed parameter, but I don't think that you
need to put "sb" in the first parameter.  A u64 is non-obvious though;
is it i_ino?  Or hashval?

> -extern struct inode *find_inode_nowait(struct super_block *,
> +struct inode *find_inode_nowait(struct super_block *,
>  				       u64,
>  				       int (*match)(struct inode *,
>  						    u64, void *),
>  				       void *data);

I think these need to be reflowed.  Before they were aligned with the
open bracket, and this demonstrates why that's a stupid convention.
And the u64 needs a name.

(other occurrences snipped)