From: Cong Zhang <cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_blk: use synchronous quiesce in virtblk_freeze_priv()
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:00:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab07749b-2aef-485c-b54c-becd26e5dfae@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912050459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 9/12/2026 5:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 04:52:44PM +0800, Cong Zhang wrote:
>> Replace blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait() with blk_mq_quiesce_queue() in
>> virtblk_freeze_priv().
>>
>> Keep the existing freeze and unfreeze order. The synchronous call waits
>> for dispatch code that was already running. The queue remains quiesced
>> until virtblk_restore_priv() calls blk_mq_unquiesce_queue().
>
>
>
> This repeatition of the code in english is not what we need
> in the commit log.
>
> Suggested format:
>
> The following issue was observed by ...: currently .... because ... this is a
> problem because ... and we can not ... because ... to fix ... so that
> ... tested by ...: before ... after ...
>
Got it. I will merge the detailed description of the issue into the
commit message.
>
>
>
>> Fixes: 7678abee0867 ("virtio-blk: don't keep queue frozen during system suspend")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Zhang <cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> no empty lines between tags please
>
Sure. Will remove this in the new patch.
>
>> ---
>> blk_mq_run_work_fn() can call blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() through
>> blk_mq_run_dispatch_ops(). The dispatcher checks QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED
>> while the flag is clear. It can then be preempted before it gets a
>> request. At that time, it has no queue usage reference, so
>> blk_mq_freeze_queue() does not wait for it.
>>
>> virtblk_freeze_priv() then calls blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait() and
>> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(). A new request can enter the queue. The old
>> dispatcher can run again, use its old flag check, get the new request,
>> and call virtio_queue_rq(). At the same time, virtblk_freeze_priv() can
>> reset the device, delete the virtqueues, and free vblk->vqs. The old
>> dispatcher can then use a deleted virtqueue or a NULL vblk->vqs, and the
>> kernel can crash.
>
>
>
> this kind of thing belongs in the commit log.
>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Cc stable@vger.kernel.org.
>
>
> which is no longer there?
>
I only CC in the mail, but not in the commit message, will add this in
the new patch.
>
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260911-virtblk_sync_quiesce-v1-1-a883f8f31258@oss.qualcomm.com
>> ---
>> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> index 32bf3ba07a9d..7a570591e040 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>> @@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static int virtblk_freeze_priv(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>
>> /* Ensure no requests in virtqueues before deleting vqs. */
>> memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
>> - blk_mq_quiesce_queue_nowait(q);
>> + blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
>> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q, memflags);
>>
>> /* Ensure we don't receive any more interrupts */
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 50d05c7c76c96b90462f24debacca971d2e86713
>> change-id: 20260910-virtblk_sync_quiesce-9b2c88d45416
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Cong Zhang <cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 8:52 Cong Zhang
2026-09-12 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-17 11:00 ` Cong Zhang [this message]
2026-09-12 9:19 ` Cong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab07749b-2aef-485c-b54c-becd26e5dfae@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=cong.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®