Re: [PATCH 00/14] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 12/28/20 3:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:15 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch series adds support for Intel Bay Trail based device which use
>> a WM5102 codec for audio output/input. This was developed and tested on a
>> Lenovo Yoga Tablet 1051L.
>>
>> This series consists of 3 parts:
>> 1. Arizona MFD drv patches for ACPI bindings, better jack-detect support
>>    and misc. fixes
>> 2. extcon-arizona driver fixes and improved jack reporting (this depends
>>    on the MFD changes)
>> 3. ASoC patches in the form of a quirk for BYTCR detecting, a new
>>    machine driver for BYT + WM5102 and jack-detect support for the new
>>    machine driver (which again depends on the MFD changes).
>>
>> Given that 2. and 3. depend on the MFD changes I believe that it is best
>> if all patches in this series are merged through the MFD tree (once
>> reviewed and acked) and then Lee can provide a immutable branch for
>> the ASoC and extcon maintainers to merge into their trees.
>>
>> I have a patch with matching UCM profile changes available here:
>> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/alsa-ucm-conf/commit/316109e7814926ba984322c1d9190575fab9021c
>>
>> This series + the UCM profile has been tested with both the SST and
>> SOF ASoC drivers for BYT devices.
> 
> Thanks for fixing this!
> I found the series pretty much in a good shape (only two patches I
> think need a bit of work), FWIW
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> after addressing comments.

Thank you, because of the jack-handling discussion I've extensively
reworked this series (and I'm going to split it into 2 series for v2).
I've kept your Reviewed-by: for the patches which are >= 99% unchanged
from v1. I've not added it to a whole bunch of new patches (and some
other patches were dropped).

>> BugLink: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2485
> 
> Shouldn't this be somewhere in the "main" fix? (Yes, I understand that
> it may sound silly and should be copied to almost half of the series,
> but if there is a good place it would be nice to have in the Git
> history)

Ack. I've added this to the:
"ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: Add machine driver for BYT/WM5102"
patches' commit msg now.

Regards,

Hans