From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
To: <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>, <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com>,
<sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<live-patching@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 22:27:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab3533a6-cb60-b553-e140-40b87fc09428@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524001637.1707472-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
On 2022/5/24 8:16, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> The ORC code needs to be reorganized into arch-specific and generic parts
> so that architectures other than X86 can use the generic parts.
>
> orc_types.h contains the following ORC definitions shared between objtool
> and the kernel:
>
> - ORC register definitions which are arch-specific.
> - orc_entry structure which is generic.
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/orc_entry.h b/include/linux/orc_entry.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3d49e3b9dabe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/orc_entry.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _ORC_ENTRY_H
> +#define _ORC_ENTRY_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * This struct is more or less a vastly simplified version of the DWARF Call
> + * Frame Information standard. It contains only the necessary parts of DWARF
> + * CFI, simplified for ease of access by the in-kernel unwinder. It tells the
> + * unwinder how to find the previous SP and BP (and sometimes entry regs) on
> + * the stack for a given code address. Each instance of the struct corresponds
> + * to one or more code locations.
> + */
> +struct orc_entry {
> + s16 sp_offset;
> + s16 fp_offset;
> +#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> + unsigned sp_reg:4;
> + unsigned fp_reg:4;
Are sp_reg & fp_reg & end needed? I noticed that they are not used in
reliability checking.
> + unsigned type:3;
> + unsigned end:1;
> +#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
> + unsigned fp_reg:4;
> + unsigned sp_reg:4;
> + unsigned unused:4;
> + unsigned end:1;
> + unsigned type:3;
> +#endif
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* _ORC_ENTRY_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e81e773678f88f7c2ff7480e2eb096973ec198db>
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] objtool: Reorganize CFI code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] objtool: Reorganize instruction-related code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] objtool: Move decode_instructions() to a separate file madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] objtool: Reorganize Unwind hint code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types madvenka
2022-05-24 14:27 ` Chen Zhongjin [this message]
2022-05-29 15:36 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC kernel code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] objtool: arm64: Implement decoder for FP validation madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder madvenka
2022-05-24 14:09 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-29 14:49 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-01 22:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-07 18:13 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] objtool: arm64: Compute destinations for call and jump instructions madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction madvenka
2022-05-24 13:45 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:18 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30 1:44 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] objtool: arm64: Generate ORC data from CFI for object files madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] objtool: arm64: Dump ORC data present in " madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] objtool: arm64: Add unwind hint support madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: Add unwind hints to specific points in code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: Add kernel and module support for ORC madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: Build the kernel with ORC information madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on ORC madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-07-01 14:16 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-07-01 19:53 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-05-24 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:30 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 12:18 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 13:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-15 14:18 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 20:50 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 20:47 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab3533a6-cb60-b553-e140-40b87fc09428@huawei.com \
--to=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®