From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932424AbcFJLMf (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:12:35 -0400 Received: from ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk ([185.25.241.215]:54569 "EHLO ducie-dc1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932150AbcFJLMd (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:12:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: exynos: fixup debug macros for big-endian To: Matthew Leach , Krzysztof Kozlowski References: <20160608183110.13851-1-matthew@mattleach.net> <20160608183110.13851-8-matthew@mattleach.net> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Dooks Organization: Codethink Limited. Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:12:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160608183110.13851-8-matthew@mattleach.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/06/16 19:31, Matthew Leach wrote: > From: Ben Dooks > > The exynos low-level debug macros need to be fixed if the system is being > built big endian. Add the necessary endian swaps for accessing the registers > to get output working again > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > --- > arch/arm/include/debug/samsung.S | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) Should this go via the maintainer or to RMK? If to RMK, then shall I get it submitted (and does anyone else want to ack?) -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius