From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: expose NVMEM cells in sysfs
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:05:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab52292c-3065-789b-d5ae-ef24bab5fc90@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcHPGQ0FH0kTzpbq@kroah.com>
On 21.12.2021 13:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:24:00PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 21.12.2021 08:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:53:32AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> On 21.12.2021 07:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:39:24AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>> On 21.12.2021 07:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 09:39:43PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20.12.2021 09:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 07:47:30AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> static void nvmem_cell_entry_add(struct nvmem_cell_entry *cell)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &cell->nvmem->dev;
>>>>>>>>>> + int err;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> mutex_lock(&nvmem_mutex);
>>>>>>>>>> list_add_tail(&cell->node, &cell->nvmem->cells);
>>>>>>>>>> mutex_unlock(&nvmem_mutex);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + sysfs_attr_init(&cell->battr.attr);
>>>>>>>>>> + cell->battr.attr.name = cell->name;
>>>>>>>>>> + cell->battr.attr.mode = 0400;
>>>>>>>>>> + cell->battr.read = nvmem_cell_attr_read;
>>>>>>>>>> + err = sysfs_add_bin_file_to_group(&dev->kobj, &cell->battr,
>>>>>>>>>> + nvmem_cells_group.name);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why not just use the is_bin_visible attribute instead to determine if
>>>>>>>>> the attribute should be shown or not instead of having to add it
>>>>>>>>> after-the-fact which will race with userspace and loose?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm sorry I really don't see how you suggest to get it done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can use .is_bin_visible() callback indeed to respect nvmem->root_only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't understand addig-after-the-fact part. How is .is_bin_visible()
>>>>>>>> related to adding attributes for newly created cells?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are adding a sysfs attribute to a device that is already registered
>>>>>>> in the driver core, and so the creation of that attribute is never seen
>>>>>>> by userspace. The attribute needs to be attached to the device _BEFORE_
>>>>>>> it is registered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, huge hint, if a driver has to call as sysfs_*() call, something is
>>>>>>> wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you mean I can
>>>>>>>> avoid calling sysfs_add_bin_file_to_group()?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you recall any existing example of such solution?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Loads.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just add this attribute group to your driver as a default attribute
>>>>>>> group and the driver core will create it for you if needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Or if you always need it, no need to mess sith is_bin_visible() at all,
>>>>>>> I can't really understand what you are trying to do here at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot! In nvmem_register() first there is a call to the
>>>>>> device_register() and only later cells get added. I suppose I just have
>>>>>> to rework nvmem_register() order so that:
>>>>>> 1. Cells are collected earlier. For each cell I allocate group attribute
>>>>>
>>>>> No, add all of the attributes to the device at the beginning before you
>>>>> register it, there's no need to allocate anything.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean static structures I can't do that, because cells almost
>>>> never are static. They are not known in advance. nvmem allows cells to
>>>> be:
>>>> 1. Specified in OF
>>>> 2. Submitted as list while registering a NVMEM device
>>>>
>>>> So every cells gets its own structure allocated dynamically. My plan is
>>>> to put bin_attribute in that struct and then create a group collecting
>>>> all those cells.
>>>
>>> A device has a driver associated with it, and that driver has default
>>> groups associated with it. Use that, I am not saying to use static
>>> structures, that is not how the driver model works at all.
>>
>> I'm helpless on dealing with attributes.
>>
>> I tried building a list of attributes dynamically but that of course
>> fails:
>>
>> drivers/nvmem/core.c: In function ‘nvmem_register’:
>> drivers/nvmem/core.c:930:31: error: assignment of member ‘bin_attrs’ in read-only object
>> 930 | nvmem_cells_group.bin_attrs = nvmem->cells_bin_attrs;
>> | ^
>>
>>
>> What I'm trying to achieve is having
>> /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/*/cells/*
>> with each file being an attribute.
>
> What is the full path here that you are looking to add these attributes
> to? Where is the struct device in play? What .c file should I look at?
>
>> Please kindly point me to a single example of "struct attribute_group"
>> that has a variable list of attributes with each attribute having
>> runtime set name.
>
> Why would you ever want each attribute have a runtime-set name? That's
> not what attributes are for. Think of them as "key/value" pairs. The
> "key" part is the name (i.e. filename), that is well known to everyone,
> unique to that struct device type, and documented in Documentation/ABI/.
> The "value" part is the value you read from the file (or write to it.)
>
> That's it, it's not all that complex.
>
>> Almost all cases in kernel look like:
>> static const struct attribute_group foo_attr_group = {
>> .attrs = foo_attrs,
>> };
>> with "foo_attrs" being a list of attributes with *predefined* names.
>
> Yes, because that is what you really want.
>
> Why do you feel this device is somehow unique to deserve attributes that
> are not predefined? And if they are not predefined, how are you going
> to define them when you create them in the code and document them? :)
>
>> Every example of dynamic attributes (runtime created) I see in a kernel
>> (e.g. drivers/base/node.c) uses sysfs_*().
>
> drivers/base/* is not the best place to look at for how to implement
> bus/driver logic, look at existing busses and drivers instead please.
> We have a few hundred to choose from :)
>
> So, let's break it down, what exactly are you wanting your device on
> your bus to look like? What will be the attributes you want to expose,
> and what are the values of those attributes? You have to start with
> that, as Documentation/ABI/ is going to require you to write them down.
This patch subject / body is a basic summary. It's about
drivers/nvmem/core.c .
Let me explain it with more details:
NVMEM is a data blob.
NVMEM consists of entries called cells.
Example:
U-Boot environment variables is NVMEM. Example:
00000000 c4 09 30 54 62 6f 6f 74 63 6d 64 3d 74 66 74 70 |..0Tbootcmd=tftp|
00000010 00 62 6f 6f 74 64 65 6c 61 79 3d 35 00 65 74 68 |.bootdelay=5.eth|
A single environment variable is NVMEM cell. Example:
bootcmd=tftp
bootdelay=5
Every NVMEM device is exposed in sysfs as:
/sys/bus/nvmem/devices/*/
You can read NVMEM blob doing
cat /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/*/nvmem | hexdump -C
What I'm trying to do is to expose NVMEM cells in sysfs as:
/sys/bus/nvmem/devices/cells/*
Example:
$ cat /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/foo/cells/bootcmd
tftp
$ cat /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/foo/cells/bootdelay
5
As you can see above NVMEM cells are not known at compilation time.
So I believe the question is: how can I expose cells in sysfs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-21 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 6:47 [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: add sysfs_add_bin_file_to_group() Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-20 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: expose NVMEM cells in sysfs Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-20 8:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-20 20:39 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 6:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 6:39 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 6:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 6:53 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 7:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 12:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 12:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 13:05 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2021-12-21 13:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 13:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 14:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 15:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 15:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-21 15:33 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 0:11 ` John Thomson
2021-12-20 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: add sysfs_add_bin_file_to_group() Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab52292c-3065-789b-d5ae-ef24bab5fc90@gmail.com \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome