mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: sieberf@amazon.com,mingo@redhat.com,peterz@infradead.org,juri.lelli@redhat.com,vincent.guittot@linaro.org,tj@kernel.org
Cc: bsegall@google.com,dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,rostedt@goodmis.org,mgorman@suse.de,vschneid@redhat.com,kprateek.nayak@amd.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,mkoutny@suse.com,void@manifault.com,arighi@nvidia.com,changwoo@igalia.com,skhan@linuxfoundation.org,corbet@lwn.net,rdunlap@infradead.org,cgroups@vger.kernel.org,sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,nh-open-source@amazon.com,hborghor@amazon.de,fmubeen@amazon.de,dwmw@amazon.co.uk,karataev@amazon.com,sieberf@amazon.com,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,mason@kernel.org,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] sched_ext: add cgroup_set_runtime ops callback
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab530d93c7383ec9cd5d9fbedc531e933d4b812ddb367bb85c940b870d34c247@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a07b9717684d5e20d8ff7a778a5f031d1092f18a.1794303670.git.sieberf@amazon.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3194 bytes --]

> sched_ext: add cgroup_set_runtime ops callback

TL;DR: The documented guarantee that cgroup_set_runtime never exceeds the
quota the scheduler was last given may not hold for schedulers lacking
cgroup_init or cgroup_set_bandwidth; comment and commit message may need
qualifying, or validation tightened.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h

[ ... ]

> @@ -863,6 +863,26 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
>  	 */
>  	void (*cgroup_set_idle)(struct cgroup *cgrp, bool idle);
>  
> +	/**
> +	 * @cgroup_set_runtime: A cgroup's runtime is being set
> +	 * @cgrp: cgroup whose runtime is being set
> +	 * @runtime_us: runtime in microseconds

[ ... ]

> +	 * @cgrp has a quota, and @runtime_us is at most the quota + burst the
> +	 * scheduler was last given, by @cgroup_init or @cgroup_set_bandwidth:
> +	 * cpu.max and cpu.max.runtime writes reach the scheduler in the order
> +	 * the fair class applied them.
> +	 *
> +	 * Delivery follows the same rule as cgroup_set_weight().
> +	 */
> +	void (*cgroup_set_runtime)(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 runtime_us);

Does this guarantee hold for a scheduler that implements
cgroup_set_runtime but not cgroup_init or cgroup_set_bandwidth?  The
commit message makes the same claim: "The runtime passed is then at most
the quota + burst the scheduler was last given".

scx_group_set_bandwidth() still updates tg->scx.bw_* when the op is
missing:

    if (scx_cgroup_enabled && sch && SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cgroup_set_bandwidth) && ...)
            SCX_CALL_OP(sch, cgroup_set_bandwidth, ...);
    tg->scx.bw_period_us = period_us;
    tg->scx.bw_quota_us = quota_us;
    tg->scx.bw_burst_us = burst_us;

while scx_group_set_runtime() calls the op whenever
SCX_HAS_OP(sch, cgroup_set_runtime) is true, and the fair class only
checks the runtime against its own cfs_b->quota + cfs_b->burst in
cfs_bandwidth_set_runtime().

For example, take a scheduler with cgroup_init and cgroup_set_runtime but
no cgroup_set_bandwidth.  Cgroup C has cpu.max "10000 100000" at load, so
ops.cgroup_init() sees bw_quota_us=10000.  Userspace then writes cpu.max
"50000 100000", which the fair class applies but the scheduler is never
told about.  A following write of 40000 to cpu.max.runtime passes
cfs_bandwidth_set_runtime() since 40000 <= 50000, and
ops.cgroup_set_runtime(C, 40000) runs, four times the quota the scheduler
was last given.

Similarly, a scheduler without cgroup_init that loads after C's quota was
set is never given a quota, yet still receives cgroup_set_runtime for that
cgroup.

Should the comment (and commit message) make the guarantee conditional on
the scheduler implementing @cgroup_init and @cgroup_set_bandwidth, or
should validation reject cgroup_set_runtime without cgroup_set_bandwidth?
The later commit eb360e17b06e ("sched_ext: charge BPF scheduler tasks to
cpu.max bandwidth") does not change this text.


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/42982707042

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 11:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] sched/fair: cpu.max.runtime and idle refill for CPU credits Fernand Sieber
2026-11-10 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/fair: expose cpu.max.runtime to set bandwidth runtime directly Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11  8:28   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/fair: refill bandwidth for the periods the timer slept through Fernand Sieber
2026-11-10 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched_ext: add cgroup_set_runtime ops callback Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11  8:08   ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-11-10 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched_ext: charge BPF scheduler tasks to cpu.max bandwidth Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11  8:28   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-10 20:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] sched/fair: cpu.max.runtime and idle refill for CPU credits Tejun Heo
2026-11-11 12:20   ` Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11 17:26     ` Tejun Heo
2026-11-12  8:11       ` Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/fair: cpu.max.runtime and idle refill for a burstable budget Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11 12:29   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: expose cpu.max.runtime to set bandwidth runtime directly Fernand Sieber
2026-11-11 12:29   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/fair: refill bandwidth for the periods the timer slept through Fernand Sieber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab530d93c7383ec9cd5d9fbedc531e933d4b812ddb367bb85c940b870d34c247@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=fmubeen@amazon.de \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hborghor@amazon.de \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=karataev@amazon.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sieberf@amazon.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®