From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com (mail-pf1-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFAB0134A6; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707243937; cv=none; b=e3WElZ/GB5d5+LGKWH4bR3d+k29ugM8/yDSYVxs9p2F6+S1g94BL70ip8Cx6epdcPawDZZx6uGslWKt/Tl9Ofya9AFVT3Av4lHwGIR4lPhYxD+KsT+uVqUC7Qw1NYUZ9Rlc4/7VuzCJn3VF58qkAhhd5h2ny1Et+Qe4bBapACM4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707243937; c=relaxed/simple; bh=boIl8+TYOpv1nFJrU868vTSHC6Kp2anwFIqbK6Q1jnY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=I7V4qBwBwBYVe1cuyHF+zurJ8S6V8X+KzaSBFcaqk91HA1XlRshFUbz3Qzitfe/WZsu/GTPynGJHuCegUcV2M8ujiPk7YrMEHb6hkL/F2MeT/MuSU4Vvp+slkha+yv3DtOlkhVBd0Y+lZ5Gv9zBEpk7JRoNHGPqh2CguZpxLng8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e054f674b3so1014973b3a.1; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:25:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707243935; x=1707848735; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u7OPD6Ab0mIup3vmBPQkMwBWi3PgXlH+8pyREPGDz9Y=; b=v0VIUnmQovpz5l4ulIwG6WSY84OFbOLPOITXpZM/Wh2/MTChsWWreQqXpfVDBwnOMT V/zXnBHQ0mBLUrolXC+WS/9vcuKTg6esBC6XvWcZkCSnjcbJOrLhIC8lWz1NTl94MlKF fsD1qHEn6kce1SOQAfy6NW7nh1/yjGvEyTyCS/j2XNrhbjAp9x/vMHXQ/aJVk1MEkU1a Ru1ScSyenlHs8y+/b8R7n2JL/r3XYYHn6XOmZCXSL8+u7xhubOiW/PVOz2vpCV2g79/p AriwvCA7/8sW0KotNEJMBJSqz8LXShRBrt1drveGPHTxHHq9vUSUOnqhq+hav3V09AwW tmXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAF6aURDegRiVu9+V4Bou6LXz781QJz2jDFCjDT7CycUSDiaoK ZRx+c3AhHQ4VydFy29iYHmSpbumxYwyhhdDAyAvfmNKJ3GWM0Rkb X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHzeykEQwnsURnDGMQmcK034wo8Yyz29Yv15z5NhGJQqVfCW8LjcHZxg3Cogyua2OkJdCQNZw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:189f:b0:6e0:450c:4a2b with SMTP id x31-20020a056a00189f00b006e0450c4a2bmr439535pfh.9.1707243934774; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:25:34 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=0; AJvYcCXMbyrLJfHQlzb/E9hQ/ZbCWDLa3IOdY4U9HOq7NNOjTVJ1tXcrmZy1lk4iBD49XYCVEVLJFX9PaGoVp/eLzaE4vlc3kngGwCQLOPXloNsqBwyyb1jLJ40PK0WnujNyqVhKrpnUMbBKWv0mGY7yCGZil7/9d1fM5DXQnlR65q+JKPj2NTZb Received: from ?IPV6:2620:0:1000:8411:cdf4:99a4:cfef:d785? ([2620:0:1000:8411:cdf4:99a4:cfef:d785]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id du23-20020a056a002b5700b006e053870d46sm2265781pfb.124.2024.02.06.10.25.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Feb 2024 10:25:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:25:32 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Restore data lifetime support Content-Language: en-US To: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , "Martin K . Petersen" References: <20240202203926.2478590-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20240206-kunden-postfach-7fb32cb79486@brauner> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20240206-kunden-postfach-7fb32cb79486@brauner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/6/24 05:35, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:22:40 +1100, David Disseldorp wrote: >> If initrd_start cpio extraction fails, CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM triggers >> fallback to initrd.image handling via populate_initrd_image(). >> The populate_initrd_image() call follows successful extraction of any >> built-in cpio archive at __initramfs_start, but currently performs >> built-in archive extraction a second time. >> >> Prior to commit b2a74d5f9d446 ("initramfs: remove clean_rootfs"), >> the second built-in initramfs unpack call was used to repopulate entries >> removed by clean_rootfs(), but it's no longer necessary now the contents >> of the previous extraction are retained. >> >> [...] > > I've pulled this in. There was a minor merge-conflict with > fs/iomap/buffer_write.c that I've resolved. Please double-check that > it's sane. I'll treat this branch as stable by Friday since I know you > want to rely on it. Thanks! The patches on the vfs.rw branch look good to me and pass my regression tests. > We can do it right now but I reckon that there might still be an ack or > two incoming that you wanted. I'm not sure acks will be incoming despite earlier promises. The following was promised almost two years ago: "If at some point there's a desire to actually try and upstream this support, then we'll be happy to review that patchset." [ ... ] "As I've said multiple times, whenever code is available, it'll be reviewed and discussed." Sources: * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ef77ef36-df95-8658-ff54-7d8046f5d0e7@kernel.dk/, March 2022. * https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/95588225-b2af-72b6-2feb-811a3b346f9f@kernel.dk/, March 2022. Bart.