From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8881BC433EF for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232320AbiAZVZe (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:25:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231665AbiAZVZd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:25:33 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22b.google.com (mail-oi1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F016FC06161C; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y23so2058678oia.13; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:content-language:to :cc:references:from:subject:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Obxrbqjwxsi1/QOHHdg4l4SwLk+iJQUgcbMubNB4HNc=; b=IP8ccAarolOPGdvNJNCz756teqHKJ79/MZ1MnfQ8f/8JnGyL73r6VsdRkEiKMjgg83 +A7f7yTypYVRkSepMFaQmrfhqTRhcR2KUIMqRxk3Ezbi7Sh/KzoehUpGK2u8CRe6zfTL LAGTuZyo0TKPYoEoztnHowKA7+R4IDUFzq9oYZHps/aIDZMs03QWpY12FB2haFuPzU66 iBpYCNvxOjNtD5fvfHL8nQb2bkUQsAA1f51DUZB7Pj4jIjnLBKG63NfPUHpayq5e2aQT 9bV83OVybzfkKvprE/WH1bKYK74RF/xN2l6xyO/vnSjU0WYaN5Ui/5JtLib1yjPVM3lE H5/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :content-language:to:cc:references:from:subject:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Obxrbqjwxsi1/QOHHdg4l4SwLk+iJQUgcbMubNB4HNc=; b=F+7BkV9Aipzk3A6c9qv1mivrY7Wt9VNPPBkdff/vdnJ8AiUb5zU10Y/3MAerGCCsWR cFpgKT4MlAcwbOGSYA7p/5LDQttJFJ5boKNCZkH+RIp1TgekpsraLMRbppPjvjU7GtZL 9V8eoHlcUactsz2k7PwizJNCV6S4gz0nGtivmA2R6xPtrZmra9PWgnEZZYs2FCSUdV0D ZCPtgruKK3rF8tm+qA5/AoSHz0vS4OpYZnG4e1Os4UEeijll5VxHBlmppx0YE3s91c4I TyBjEbreYg6HVWfQdCgsbj3OEmfxRxzlm/zO/QUCutHjSOt7CIX3uC0JOIzEQJFW43Ni /iiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QCPncIZq3Us1CKxGgwq3ejFv6kgBGdy65Wx4GBI1/Dh16TUCA WwtTxGLxRZ+xkI3GTfYLMca4upDHFUY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyb/0AOYIQ4bTYOsG+CiyTLBLW64+qUNBlTWGM75BJgnrwowfYgNMM8rcabC5Exhu1aT70Ivg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1691:: with SMTP id bb17mr4969321oib.120.1643232332394; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c? ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n67sm2658674oib.31.2022.01.26.13.25.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:25:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:25:29 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20220124183927.095545464@linuxfoundation.org> From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/114] 4.4.300-rc1 review In-Reply-To: <20220124183927.095545464@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On 1/24/22 10:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.300 release. > There are 114 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > A new version of this branch was pushed into the stable-queue git repository around 10:30 PST, AFAICS without any actual changes. This caused all my builders to start from scratch (again). Would it be possible to avoid such dummy pushes ? Thanks, Guenter