From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
benjamin.cheatham@amd.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: cxl/region.c improvements and DAX/Hotplug plumbing
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:14:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abwS5BK0erHVkKKH@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <217b154d-e4d1-4824-b2e3-fea82bc44402@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:53:05AM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> > and would change the sysfs pattern to
> > echo regionN > cxl/decoder0.0/create_ram_region
> > echo regionN > cxl/drivers/sysram_region/bind
> > echo online_movable > cxl/devices/dax_regionN/hotplug
> > echo dax_regionN > cxl/drivers/dax_region/bind
> >
> > and gives the user a chance to configure a policy before the region
> > is pumped all the way through to the endpoint dax driver.
>
> Would that still be backwards-compatible?
>
I've since squared this away with the CXL groups, the answer is a
different probe path and leaving the auto-probe logic alone.
I still need to re-submit the /hotplug extensions here as an improvement
because its useful - but i've cleaned it up considerably to avoid the
cross-subsystem nonsense.
> >
> > For most use-cases yes. For something like FAMFS (distributed shared
> > memory), one system onlining a block as kmem could be potentially
> > destructive to an entirely separate physical server.
>
> Right. But shouldn't we fail this already at the add_memory() stage?
> Sounds like during onlining is a bit too late. Conceptually, the hotplug
> as sysram was already wrong for famfs, or am I wrong?
>
Mostly this describes the baggage associated with auto-hotplug path for
all CXL memory, and the fact that we only have a global-scope auto MHP
tag. I've come around to better solutions to this problem.
Thanks for the read n_n
~Gregory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 19:38 Gregory Price
2026-01-22 16:28 ` Gregory Price
2026-01-22 22:14 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-23 0:28 ` Gregory Price
2026-03-18 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-19 15:14 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-03-19 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abwS5BK0erHVkKKH@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
--to=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®