From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ref_tracker: add ability to register a file in debugfs for a ref_tracker_dir
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:54:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1b4cf8ef40b8f723abad5c5421e3dc9ad310c0.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b697c51c0788e4e462e45a5cc78d3b5c2d01d496.camel@kernel.org>
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 06:23 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 01:08 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:45:47AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Currently, there is no convenient way to see the info that the
> > > ref_tracking infrastructure collects. Add a new function that other
> > > subsystems can optionally call to update the name field in the
> > > ref_tracker_dir and register a corresponding seq_file for it in the
> > > top-level ref_tracker directory.
> > >
> > > Also, alter the pr_ostream infrastructure to allow the caller to specify
> > > a seq_file to which the output should go instead of printing to an
> > > arbitrary buffer or the kernel's ring buffer.
> >
> > When i see an Also, or And, or a list in a commit message, i always
> > think, should this be multiple patches?
> >
>
> Sure. I actually had this part in a separate patch earlier, but I don't
> usually like adding functions with no callers and this patch was pretty
> small. I can break it up though.
>
> > > struct ostream {
> > > char *buf;
> > > + struct seq_file *seq;
> > > int size, used;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -73,7 +83,9 @@ struct ostream {
> > > ({ \
> > > struct ostream *_s = (stream); \
> > > \
> > > - if (!_s->buf) { \
> > > + if (_s->seq) { \
> > > + seq_printf(_s->seq, fmt, ##args); \
> > > + } else if (!_s->buf) { \
> > > pr_err(fmt, ##args); \
> > > } else { \
> > > int ret, len = _s->size - _s->used; \
> >
> > The pr_ostream() macro is getting pretty convoluted. It currently
> > supports two user cases:
> >
> > struct ostream os = {}; which means just use pr_err().
> >
> > And os.buf points to an allocated buffer and the output should be
> > dumped there.
> >
> > You are about to add a third.
> >
> > Is it about time this got split up into three helper functions, and
> > you pass one to __ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream()? Your choice.
> >
>
> Maybe? It doesn't seem worth it for this, but I'll take a look.
>
> >
I took a crack at this and it's trickier than it looks. We have to pass
a variadic function pointer (which is fine), but that means that they
can't use handy macros like pr_err. We have to call functions that can
take a va_list (which is also fine).
The part I'm having trouble with is incorporating the pr_fmt(). I've
attached the patch I have on top of the current series. It doesn't
compile for me. If I remove the pr_fmt() calls and just pass in the
format string, it does compile.
What am I doing wrong here?
-------------------------8<---------------------------------
[PATCH] ref_tracker: have callers pass output function to pr_ostream
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
lib/ref_tracker.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/ref_tracker.c b/lib/ref_tracker.c
index 4cc49cc21f5b..e131fdc51838 100644
--- a/lib/ref_tracker.c
+++ b/lib/ref_tracker.c
@@ -77,21 +77,41 @@ struct ostream {
char *buf;
struct seq_file *seq;
int size, used;
+ void (*func)(struct ostream *stream, char *fmt, ...);
};
+#define ref_tracker_log(fmt, args) vprintk_emit(0, LOGLEVEL_ERR, NULL,
pr_fmt(fmt), args)
+
+static void pr_ostream_log(struct ostream *stream, char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+
+ ref_tracker_log(fmt, args);
+}
+
+#define ref_tracker_vsnprintf(buf, size, fmt, args) vsnprintf(buf,
size, pr_fmt(fmt), args)
+
+static void pr_ostream_buf(struct ostream *stream, char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ int ret, len = stream->size - stream->used;
+ va_list args;
+
+ ret = ref_tracker_vsnprintf(stream->buf + stream->used, len,
fmt, args);
+ stream->used += min(ret, len);
+}
+
+static void pr_ostream_seq(struct ostream *stream, char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+
+ seq_vprintf(stream->seq, fmt, args);
+}
+
#define pr_ostream(stream, fmt, args...) \
({ \
struct ostream *_s = (stream); \
\
- if (_s->seq) { \
- seq_printf(_s->seq, fmt, ##args); \
- } else if (!_s->buf) { \
- pr_err(fmt, ##args); \
- } else { \
- int ret, len = _s->size - _s->used; \
- ret = snprintf(_s->buf + _s->used, len, pr_fmt(fmt),
##args); \
- _s->used += min(ret, len); \
- } \
+ _s->func(_s, fmt, ##args); \
})
static void
@@ -138,7 +158,7 @@ __ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream(struct ref_tracker_dir
*dir,
void ref_tracker_dir_print_locked(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
unsigned int display_limit)
{
- struct ostream os = {};
+ struct ostream os = { .func = pr_ostream_log };
__ref_tracker_dir_pr_ostream(dir, display_limit, &os);
}
@@ -157,7 +177,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ref_tracker_dir_print);
int ref_tracker_dir_snprint(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir, char *buf,
size_t size)
{
- struct ostream os = { .buf = buf, .size = size };
+ struct ostream os = { .buf = buf, .size = size, .func =
pr_ostream_buf };
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dir->lock, flags);
@@ -294,7 +314,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ref_tracker_free);
static int ref_tracker_dir_seq_print(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
struct seq_file *seq)
{
- struct ostream os = { .seq = seq };
+ struct ostream os = { .seq = seq, .func = pr_ostream_seq };
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dir->lock, flags);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 14:45 [PATCH 0/4] ref_tracker: register debugfs files for each ref_tracker_dir Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] ref_tracker: add a top level debugfs directory for ref_tracker Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 22:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-14 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] ref_tracker: add ability to register a file in debugfs for a ref_tracker_dir Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 22:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-14 23:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-15 10:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-15 12:54 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-04-15 14:50 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: add ref_tracker_dir_debugfs() calls for netns refcount tracking Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: register debugfs file for net_device refcnt tracker Jeff Layton
2025-04-14 22:27 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-14 23:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-04-15 1:56 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac1b4cf8ef40b8f723abad5c5421e3dc9ad310c0.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qasdev00@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®