From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409C53B4E85 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777456074; cv=none; b=QO7sn57NNgJyTWdQVk7tl7U4EHrs/vZBUYMc1lXdDn/uHWJChrg4qmpq8LV/HFitbSe1H/uoNlyTkLDm08Ejc40qJ1fsPpEn5rDSOK4A9Wtb9VPcgVkPqHN7LFpK+6LZveAIjPmd9NiQCZWvotP1FQkT4jgoJcxVR0kX7Om9DcI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777456074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qtXBcDFocw4x0F7opPO8gV3iHriv7qDIh9BOCOXBN9U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=F4y010ja08DcRd8Evi8qlZ9Oj/MRh+9IdiPQDSg9rAp1HENv69uHZpauplqhknlXkNIYIysHvH0iz2aZ1HG3O4ijc6Heab222zKp2+xpXK1OgBqTaTvnXClLB+Au9reVMaxo08sqI6wUNpXZUsXdSV4dhNMLeIWssZPRETy7dpc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=h-partners.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=h-partners.com header.i=@h-partners.com header.b=joF9WSqB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=h-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=h-partners.com header.i=@h-partners.com header.b="joF9WSqB" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=h-partners.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=yU5fi/v3zan09l5b6cJAYDMcf+8GT8TM0pjwVcb64JE=; b=joF9WSqBy8iDBkOIo6eAfyuk9ZJYs4ZNyLIPXSdliYryWxhIff6iKBaSgdfhTQq7/NlP68r3D CGd3QC14Q9FBddM8mQ7UEqgeOGMCpvJLQRlP/TsXyRydn8V8E6WVktNHD6u9Zwi1bWOkKe0zSIo hdBTpfa3CccCxCLP8i211Lk= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.140]) by canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4g5C3y4rNHz1prLd; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:41:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemf100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.222]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EC8420226; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:47:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.37] (10.174.179.37) by kwepemf100008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:47:47 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:47:46 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 next 00/10] arm_mpam: Introduce Narrow-PARTID feature Content-Language: en-US To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" , "ben.horgan@arm.com" , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "reinette.chatre@intel.com" , "fenghuay@nvidia.com" , "tglx@kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "babu.moger@amd.com" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "tony.luck@intel.com" , "gshan@redhat.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "TY4PR01MB16930EB1ACB3A3356A92169BC8B232@TY4PR01MB16930.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com" CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com" References: <1d9cee5a-38be-7115-51ef-b7109aa4ab5e@huawei.com> From: Zeng Heng In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.238) To kwepemf100008.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.222) Hi Shaopeng, On 2026/4/28 12:20, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote: > Hello Zeng Heng, > > > I hope this email finds you well. > >> As indicated in the patch series tags, this patch set applies to the >> linux-next repository, specifically the master branch at: >> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > > This patch series could not be applied correctly to the master branch. > Thank you very much for your reply. I checked the patch and found that patch 2 has the following context conflict, which is not a logical conflict: ~~~ diff a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c (rejected hunks) @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable) mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].resctrl_res.alloc_capable = false; if (enable) { - if (mpam_partid_max < 1) + if (mpam_intpartid_max < 1) return -EINVAL; partid_d = resctrl_get_config_index(RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, CDP_DATA); ~~~ This conflict is caused by the following commit: ~~~ commit f758340da529ccb12531c3f83d5992e912f6c8d5 Author: Zeng Heng Date: Mon Apr 13 17:00:41 2026 +0800 arm_mpam: resctrl: Fix MBA CDP alloc_capable handling on unmount ~~~ This is merely a context conflict. Please feel free to resolve it locally for now, or I will fix this patch conflict in the next version as soon as possible. Apart from this, the remaining patches apply cleanly against the latest linux-next or linux mainline tree. > >> Keep me in the mail list for follow-up responses if you want my feedback >> in time. I was accidentally dropped from the mail list in a previous >> thread (see >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/TY4PR01MB16930EB1ACB3A3356A92169BC8B232@TY4PR01MB16930.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/). > > I've confirmed that your email address was correctly in the recipient field, and the email was sent successfully on my end. > Also, it seems that I sometimes don't receive your emails. > I'm not entirely sure why this is happening, as my email settings appear to be configured correctly. > > From the lore archive records, it exactly appears that my email address was indeed not included in the recipient list. Please double-check: https://lore.kernel.org/all/TY4PR01MB16930EB1ACB3A3356A92169BC8B232@TY4PR01MB16930.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com/ I believe this was simply a typo. And Looking forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Zeng Heng