Re: [Scst-devel] Discussion about SCST sysfs layout and implementation.

[Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 17:50, Daniel Debonzi
<debonzi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Do you mean that uses struct device is the right way to do it instead of
> kobjects or it is just a option to get things on right places into sysfs?

You can not put kobjects in /sys/devices/ and there will be no
disconnected kobject tree just for scsi, unless the scsi maintainers
really want want that, and then they should create their own
filesystem instead, and not use kobjects at all.

> I don't know this struct closely but my first impression looking to the
> source code is that it is tied with hardware and has some complexity we
> probably don't need. What do you think?

If you want to integrate with the current scsi devices/objects, which
is the only sensible option I think, you have to use struct device
devices, kobjects will not get a classification in sysfs, and will be
invisible for userspace tools unless you do random readdir() in
/sys/devices/ to find them.

Kay