From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle changes
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:29:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510911190529p6810508fve4941f3077dfd3d9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091119130107.GB20949@srcf.ucam.org>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 14:01, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:09:30PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 22:33, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
>> > My use cases are on the order of a second.
>>
>> Ok, what's the specific use case, which should be triggered after a
>> second? I thought you were thinking about disk spindown or similar.
>
> The first is altering ALPM policy. ALPM will be initiated by the host if
> the number of queued requests hits zero - if there's no hysteresis
> implemented, then that can result in a significant performance hit. We
> don't need /much/ hysteresis, but it's the difference between a 50%
> performance hit and not having that.
Can't that logic live entirely in the kernel, instead of being a
rather generic userspace event interface (with the current limitation
to a single user)?
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-19 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 14:37 Matthew Garrett
2009-11-17 15:55 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-17 16:09 ` David Zeuthen
2009-11-17 18:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:30 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 19:47 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 19:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 20:03 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 20:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:06 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:29 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:39 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-18 21:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 21:40 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 11:09 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 13:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 13:29 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2009-11-19 14:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:25 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 14:34 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-19 14:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-19 15:00 ` Kay Sievers
2009-11-20 20:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-22 23:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-23 14:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 14:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 14:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-11-23 19:50 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-23 19:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-12-11 21:20 ` [RFC] Add support for events " Matthew Garrett
2009-11-18 22:10 ` [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac3eb2510911190529p6810508fve4941f3077dfd3d9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fubar.dk \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®