From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: Fix kobject_set_name_vargs()
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2511003112046h7b77378amebbd3d63ce8a10a0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3eb2511003112039i7c2009a9gcadb760f128dab6c@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:39, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:15, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:50:52PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> In case of kvasprintf() failure, we can leak old kobject name.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
>>> index 8115eb1..1247c57 100644
>>> --- a/lib/kobject.c
>>> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
>>> @@ -222,8 +222,10 @@ int kobject_set_name_vargs(struct kobject *kobj, const char *fmt,
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> kobj->name = kvasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, vargs);
>>> - if (!kobj->name)
>>> + if (!kobj->name) {
>>> + kobj->name = old_name;
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> + }
>>
>> Are you sure? I think we've been over this very thing many times in the
>> past...
>>
>> Kay, I can't recall the issue here, can you?
>
> I think we just lost attention to it, and never made a final decision.
> There have been some issues, I also don't really remember.
>
> I myself have an unsubmitted patch for this problem here since 9 months:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kay/patches.git;a=blob;f=kobj-leak.patch;hb=HEAD
>
> Seems, we should start thinking about the problem again. And if we
> decide to do nothing at least add a comment why we don't. :)
Found the old discussion, which ended in no action:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/27/160
It was about simplifying the logic and not to allow to set a kobject
name several times in a row.
Sounds good to me to try that, and raise a BUG if the name is set a
second time. If we don't support that, all can be simplified, and the
original issue, that has come up again now, will be gone with that.
Thanks,
Kay
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 20:50 Eric Dumazet
2010-03-12 4:15 ` Greg KH
2010-03-12 4:39 ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-12 4:46 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac3eb2511003112046h7b77378amebbd3d63ce8a10a0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®