mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhao Forrest" <forrest.zhao@gmail.com>
To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>,
	discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A commit between 2.6.16.4 and 2.6.16.5 failed crashme
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:32:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac8af0be0611290132h2369b6b3m9592537c98489feb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061129083310.GC11084@stusta.de>

On 11/29/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:18:18AM -0800, Zhao Forrest wrote:
> > On 11/28/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I first need to contact the author of test case if we could send the
> > >> test case to open source. The test case is called "crashme",
> > >
> > >Is that the classical crashme as found in LTP or an enhanced one?
> > >Do you run it in a special way? Is the crash reproducible?
> > >
> > >We normally run crashme regularly as part of LTP, Cerberus etc.
> > >so at least any obvious bugs should in theory be caught.
> > >
> >
> > Let me change the subject of this thread.
> > I just read our private version of crashme. It's based on crashme
> > version 2.4 and add some logging capability, no other enhancement. So
> > it should be the same as crashme in LTP.
> >
> > It is solidly reproducible within 3 minutes of running crashme.
> >
> > The current status is: we know it's a commit between 2.6.16.4 and
> > 2.6.16.5 that introduce this bug.
> >
> > Our network is very slow(only 5-6K/second). So we'll start the
> > git-bisect tomorrow after finishing downloading the 2.6.16 stable git
> > tree.
>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> A git-bisect might be a bit of overkill considering that there were only
> two patches applied beween 2.6.16.4 and 2.6.16.5:
>
> Andi Kleen (2):
>       x86_64: Clean up execve
>       x86_64: When user could have changed RIP always force IRET (CVE-2006-0744)
>
> I've attached both patches.
>
> Could you manually bisect first applying "x86_64: Clean up execve"
> (patch-2.6.16.4-5-1) against 2.6.16.4?
>

Hi Adrian

It's the second patch(x86_64: When user could have changed RIP always
force IRET (CVE-2006-0744)) that trigger this bug.
We have run crashme on a IBM server with 2 Intel dual-core CPU, a SUN
server with 2 AMD Opteron single-core CPU and a SUN server with 8 AMD
Opteron dual-core CPU.
Running crashme can trigger kernel panic on all platforms after the
second patch is applied to 2.6.16.4. And when kernel panic happens,
there's only "Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init" on
the screen.

Please let me know if you need any further information.

Thanks,
Forrest

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-29  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-29  8:18 Zhao Forrest
2006-11-29  8:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-29  9:32   ` Zhao Forrest [this message]
2006-11-30  3:34   ` Zhao Forrest

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac8af0be0611290132h2369b6b3m9592537c98489feb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®