From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-182.mta0.migadu.com (out-182.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14999311C3E for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 03:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780371076; cv=none; b=VAGlqhR/rur4kkx5XXRUnOfW4lOO/spzil11tcJULRvq3iRBshp2hPd+u2EkG52mhSVwP+oCBICL8SlWG0UiX/pbWe5Nf0QA16nE90tBpKhGzunfxMsBw/2BdGaqIuRPn0cG/RS125cry+DB33QqqXLaldgU7kPdnqlye1i3nts= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780371076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cFYh/v+iZPRRLSnWvnURhHY04Yl25CMeUZW2Zz4RvZk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hPetd6/0521Lwi3j+SIXjuINBY+06+P9RxBH9ZhSHA9QGu9CiU8njS+aXUxl7j7ecSoVYZFENuvnyeUc1A6zh1P2XRjRPygYbsl/iNYmVp/LzvAwyPEnufrck3odIQpxZQ1r+idQQlg3NwQK5Rk+jRzGw165w+GPMdNB9adOz+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=soVy4sz1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="soVy4sz1" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1780371071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cFYh/v+iZPRRLSnWvnURhHY04Yl25CMeUZW2Zz4RvZk=; b=soVy4sz1+iTds4/Pt2yhWxp/0iqx7xqxTYPv9X43/W4p9cOsjcUlFANETjFZ95jVNU/sfd 2RxKm4kB0sxIhuK2NpSunnP3xU1ldLZ6GhRo5XiWxe40ugvMyM49G3gz8g5C7SxEggUcbD mfZqnx85lDxIPNzVWgcUrcrS18BWdIw= Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 20:31:05 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays Content-Language: en-GB To: "malin (R)" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , cenxianlong , Chenzhe , "ameryhung@gmail.com" Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Jiri Olsa , YiFei Zhu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 6/1/26 6:51 PM, malin (R) wrote: > Hello Yonghong, > >> The patch looks okay to me. But can you add a selftest for this? > OK, we will send v2 patch with added selftest. > > By the way, as the AI review bot found, this patch idea is already proposed by Amery. > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251203195050.3215728-1-ameryhung@gmail.com/ > > Should I add something like Suggested-by for him or something else? Change 'him' to 'her'. I think you can mention this in commit message. > > Thanks > Lin