From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0008D3DEFE2; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774451026; cv=none; b=fGeNwR6PA0VIyFqw+M684bDLJ9XzBt4m9A8s9ekWojQtcwSt+yXxTy/L7pm96JOcZOd1W8vxtSmYzMkc1Ct027C8ETiLNIggCGWM5nFcTWwcT4ry3Mpsdc0aSceFFpDB6EYlovxqkIPnHRuATrAdAhwxc2j0VWq5BPJyjoSXYEM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774451026; c=relaxed/simple; bh=szUY7ce718hY4kynrafrnhbG0xsCzopEqVjmUCSRZno=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ndUNX70H5FoDYcZFbYuiKLYqsDK5/yJXZ69wCmtLLh5CTDCLrarWTvwroFHbn+tPQBBOAJtzl9tc0hL8eAN6noBy4V/VgEaYaFy5QK5suYeNCouEb94IM6tmPsKkgg31UcYNmPp0sI+RyW/FXx1/ivrrjGKOj8jnBDOVnuyZ6wo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FQbADYeh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FQbADYeh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CA22C4CEF7; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:03:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774451025; bh=szUY7ce718hY4kynrafrnhbG0xsCzopEqVjmUCSRZno=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FQbADYeh4zU0XEmMWdFcUlsDdl/J3QfABPbn+wpM7hYgY5GAyWUnJaKT+4zYYj/Ah RJnYgVqC6K3d7vZHqPps8CrdAogDs1hTEHSR2/R9xiIY/Dff67zwcWPRl3cQ52aI7U yUIh4YPuHqymscRHFaPwSwdVy4FQbBIgvzvTj7UqpdMoOVqX+ov6ENMhXxLbtglf/m VBCOoi7XrSmhjDUZcyjYe8BatyhzNUFmlurN//kOmIcO7mOwZLCX9bm10wjypvSAnA P74k42yA6S0RgoJwvuSps5PcT8JRf5LYS/U33RBQCglzTGIbrXP1pF5NAWkn6vZyO6 UDoYIvEPhGvXw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w5Pln-00000004kiX-12Lx; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:03:43 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:03:43 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Felix Gu , Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Simplify devm_spi_*_controller() Message-ID: References: <176797260995.67850.318976521283878747.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20260324145548.139952-1-ustc.gu@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 11:54:34AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 10:55:48PM +0800, Felix Gu wrote: > You mean buggy driver? Any real example of the use case? > > In the 5. you implied something like > > ret = spi_alloc_host(); > ... > ret = devm_spi_register_controller() > > ? We have some 50 spi driver using a non-managed controller allocation with managed registration. This was the only way to use these interfaces before managed allocation was added much later. > But this is against the rule how devm must be used. SPI is "special"... But yeah, we should eventually fix the API to avoid inconsistencies like this. Johan