From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE1D31F9B5 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774632329; cv=none; b=pJsfmHBJUSTMmAYTp3e4ZhE1HiyqkRbymhRFcBIZjCCttpGJPdJmNwTB0oqPjvbgPogCZvsnNp+cBz3xpylIThSpZr/Gq5yAAXLRuCH6dtjTfSsGbe9SWIDMbhGmhVdmLBY8jxFlvPV63o/GTc3zAkS99beZYfKWWSZ/49uzaYI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774632329; c=relaxed/simple; bh=J2ZtS44ey2b2m3iD6de4uRfVMdpCjWHbwNExqhgQsHA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=d2tFbc0B9Wf7uTxfkj4o0+Je7xyO1wOi0KIo29RHLhhyAyZMqUePzkQaYWd8Q9QPwNR65MzMv8qfLTJ4CNnEp2iWkQQI8vEySlINohly2QutvL5X9+0QwXZhPP+7lBFbd0NWaiOEHhHLOBymIOus0Zsn/8GP6PZXC68Qv0f1jT8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mh0o5W+O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mh0o5W+O" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBFCBC19424; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:25:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774632328; bh=J2ZtS44ey2b2m3iD6de4uRfVMdpCjWHbwNExqhgQsHA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mh0o5W+O7ZdJr9v8OlqpATFkeHxzXejWbzgZl786+iDRx9bLeJtucnmNCuofO8ms7 ZcTkJwM1hB7CHB6mN6dOs1t9tHDSkEBHDKHqJ5aRspuFlMTMxWvFpQs4wQ1y1odVWG 4iWGVe9g0KcOKO11fNW24OQtfnTgqAZSl6XMRI+TlQHSvVdNHWk7YZD7CBAxTZ2vOs PL7vlrHhj0zsw7tcPzG5kQAF6dYHx4q5702ROhmjsnzfAe6BlGWFSiqnP8J4YVUOD5 XmG/1amSPUEdAwyCNkSVUtdJKisofXgxwvmh0w2qH6TWALxXlk9HIO60A2BYYcazMV NlFOQs7xSuOgg== Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:25:27 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Matthew Brost Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Lai Jiangshan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] workqueue: Add interface to teach lockdep to warn on reclaim violations Message-ID: References: <20260316043255.226352-1-matthew.brost@intel.com> <20260316043255.226352-2-matthew.brost@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 09:33:39PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote: > Can I send an independent patch addressing the WQ_MEM_WARN_ON_RECLAIM > usage above for you to pull into 7.01? I’m still working through a few > issues on my driver (Xe) side to enable this, and the larger DRM-level > changes will take some time since pretty much every driver is doing > something wrong. > > Alternatively, we could defer this to 7.02 and merge it through DRM, > since the 7.01 DRM cycle is closing today. Either option works for me. It'd probalby make sense to merge it together when DRM side is ready. Whenever you're ready to merge the users of the interface, please let me know. I'll create a separate workqueue branch with the patch on so that DRM can pull it in. Thanks. -- tejun