From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965158AbWILJXM (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:23:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965160AbWILJXL (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:23:11 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.238]:3917 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965158AbWILJXJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:23:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WV6lACEdG5qkpx66xOzyXOFU8CGRr8zMreIw6CW3t2PRg2WL+O9FPlayVzfoB0+fB1rn1hdGFSx0w/RzWTdA59sHVxLY6SL3LgE0Xun2zNV2RvYYaxzVdsVUTFLTjCK88oIrBYSYU4vomRY+aQuLy7Lewl6GJJjAeWO4Hdd5oRI= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:23:08 +0400 From: "Vitaly Wool" To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP] Cc: "Mark Gross" , "Preece Scott-PREECE" , "pm list" , "kernel list" In-Reply-To: <20060912091619.GA19482@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060911082025.GD1898@elf.ucw.cz> <20060911195546.GB11901@elf.ucw.cz> <4505CCDA.8020501@gmail.com> <20060911210026.GG11901@elf.ucw.cz> <4505DDA6.8080603@gmail.com> <20060911225617.GB13474@elf.ucw.cz> <20060912001701.GC14234@linux.intel.com> <20060912083328.GA19197@elf.ucw.cz> <20060912091619.GA19482@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > > who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?! > Eugeny? Well, as far as I understood, both parties are ready to talk about _kernel_ interface at the moment. Let's try to look at it from this very point of view. Eugeny, please correct me if my understanding is wrong. Vitaly