From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82975C0015E for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233695AbjGZOLs (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:11:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233904AbjGZOLb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:11:31 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F3635BC for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 36QE8xSU097527; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:08:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1690380539; bh=+f3waBhCs1Fbv/oJomGks9SD8myxCQnRXrm4zYMldHs=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=wqxceb5MbLaHBaltr1mz7dM+6BNf8hmZXNE/EL0Si11Ao2Hu/6h5wGVedMVmUZjCQ McCEAn5Kfy4Y+dv3SYkYH9UeunA+ZAlS7bXSF2BjqxwB7R590h4v04BH0s7wY3e8UO sVQhwZUkSGxus6mlF8Vb1st7LrDuFa2Mq5u/gkOo= Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (dfle110.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.31]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 36QE8xYd025615 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:08:59 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:08:59 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:08:59 -0500 Received: from [10.249.141.75] (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 36QE8qJJ020333; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:08:52 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:38:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable various configs for TI platforms To: Nishanth Menon CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Aradhya Bhatia , Hari Nagalla , MD Danish Anwar , Jayesh Choudhary , Judith Mendez , References: <20230726133049.2074105-1-u-kumar1@ti.com> <20230726134322.gepflrrdcpx6uxvu@colony> Content-Language: en-US From: "Kumar, Udit" In-Reply-To: <20230726134322.gepflrrdcpx6uxvu@colony> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks Nishanth On 7/26/2023 7:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > on $subject: I think mentioning K3 will help narrow things down a bit. > > On 19:00-20230726, Udit Kumar wrote: >> Enable TI ECAP, DP83869 driver, TI OMAP2, K3 remote proc > I think you mean to state TI mailbox and not omap2 :) Not really :) This driver TI OMAP2, (CONFIG_OMAP2PLUS_MBOX) is used in TI K3 platforms as well for communications with remote processors. Rest comments will address in v3. > >> SND_SOC_J721E_EVM, MCAN, UFS and RTI driver to be built >> as module. >> These are needed on different TI platforms. > Please elaborate the list of boards this benefits TI platforms are a > big variant list. TI Platforms is too generic a term that scales > architectures.. that is not the point you are trying to make. >> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia >> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla >> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar >> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary >> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra >> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez >> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar > If the various contributers are ok, just my 2 cents: > Could you drop all other sign-offs other than yours? I understand the > contributions from various members on the TI SDK tree, but I'vent seen > them attempt to upstream and you took the effort in ensuring the new > squashed patch contains all the relevant components. > > [..]