From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from codeconstruct.com.au (pi.codeconstruct.com.au [203.29.241.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF76C173; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738713952; cv=none; b=l0KtU4PtmlvCeexRbED7p/gytGAsCez7BAl4d0KJ6dqwE4eY87C0wi7/CsCf0+FEJAjLIFIaFz6iCdw5L68XNvWoNCuvHeh0E4NkrYoeRauhXFno51RYUCR3sG7nmLMhmdFKKaV+odJoXXZN/zq1mrC1kGUb424iwqSKLZhnDXo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738713952; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aMffe2cuyieFMT/ZvHdJ4Q+mva2yTWC26VFHFOFlKeI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=WZF5SQkxafObSkaYRkbDUIoKzBRMA+d8NBAPj7VTPt0Om+jN0/Fw2IcdnP/vTmpys2qqSU/7ulHyks6yn85gS4wGZYI6unrw02YM4mED5Dvc0g+tFD7axALM4MZovtqkc5fUriDwM5z4aD9EOn86ef0xLK0xp9GrfpZJjZnZmJY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b=LRIFxGFF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=203.29.241.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codeconstruct.com.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codeconstruct.com.au header.i=@codeconstruct.com.au header.b="LRIFxGFF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1738713948; bh=aMffe2cuyieFMT/ZvHdJ4Q+mva2yTWC26VFHFOFlKeI=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=LRIFxGFFHQUulv7+gJaJmDaWZ/PPEQJVmMZGlxQsy7SG15tOvvOCxT6hHwupywBAO bFTs9JIdo0/N5USrIdXdMxDqzfYs4LDT+w+9d2V2E6DVvPhUXbKta2mrcRSWADjZjJ IFHRP+OSir09zKCOJGmq5BNwhrDamJW5HcnePqwfJgdo1JUjcRR3AruwfHcdOG7cnG qKxX8ddUePxs12+jcVYZTdNBiXM3WMdrbFtjW2Xca+mLz/lRWd4bOXsBk568jKtjeo SrzUlAatdu22ie+tuIF/MRU3W8Vf34yIuNph5y4IBwrSBZ+EBo8i/jo1WRRyHZfnjV O7vCiBEdMjeRA== Received: from [192.168.68.112] (ppp118-210-185-209.adl-adc-lon-bras34.tpg.internode.on.net [118.210.185.209]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 941067104E; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 08:05:46 +0800 (AWST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC From: Andrew Jeffery To: Ninad Palsule , brgl@bgdev.pl, linus.walleij@linaro.org, minyard@acm.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, eajames@linux.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 10:35:46 +1030 In-Reply-To: <66e2e5e4-5ce5-442c-ba0f-d12cbe79e868@linux.ibm.com> References: <20250203144422.269948-1-ninad@linux.ibm.com> <79b819b6d06e3be0aa7e7f6872353f103294710c.camel@codeconstruct.com.au> <66e2e5e4-5ce5-442c-ba0f-d12cbe79e868@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 13:40 -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: > > This one needs an ack from Linus W or Bartosz if I'm to take it. > > However, it's also causing some grief from Rob's bot: > >=20 > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173859694889.2601726.10618336219726193824.r= obh@kernel.org/ > >=20 > > As the reported nodes should all be hogs the name shouldn't matter > > anywhere else (as far as I'm aware). It would be nice if all the > > warnings were cleaned up before we merged the binding update. That way > > we don't cause everyone else looking at the CHECK_DTBS=3Dy output more > > grief than they already get for the Aspeed devicetrees. > >=20 > > In order to not get bogged down it might be worth splitting out both > > the IPMB- and GPIO- related patches like you did the FTGMAC100 patch, > > and then I can merge what remains (from a quick look they seem > > relatively uncontroversial). > >=20 >=20 > The warnings are fixed by different patch by Krzysztof. As there are no= =20 > more changes then I will wait for other responses. If I don't get those= =20 > response in couple of days then I will split it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20250116085947.87241-1-krzysztof.koz= lowski@linaro.org/ That patch fixes a couple of Marvell systems. I think you might have meant this: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250116090009.87338-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@lina= ro.org/ In which case, I've applied it. Thanks, Andrew