From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yu Peng <pengyu@kylinos.cn>,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched,workqueue: Use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() for wake_cpu accesses
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:09:46 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acrYisNNAv2FEgXP@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330143629.GP3738010@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello, Peter.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 04:36:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hmmm... it would trigger KCSAN. Maybe a better way to do it is exposing
> > sched interface that does WRITE_ONCE wrapping? How do you want it resolved?
>
> Perhaps a try_to_wake_up() variant that takes a cpumask (see the
> completely untested code below). But I'm not entirely sure. The current
> thing very much relies on a bunch of implementation details that aren't
> guaranteed.
>
> The below will 'fake' the task cpumask for a while; and note that the
> caller has to be careful to provide a mask that only includes tasks that
> were set in the current task, otherwise 'funny' things will happen.
> Also, it will only use this mask if it ends up doing CPU selection at
> all.
>
> Ooh, I suppose I should make sure wake_cpu is inside the provided map
> too...
Does it need to be? I think all select_task_rq() implementations ignore it
if it's outside allowed. I think all we'd need is cpumask_subset() test to
reject (and trigger WARN_ON_ONCE()) if the preferred mask is not within the
allowed.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 7:30 Yu Peng
2026-03-27 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-27 17:04 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-30 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-30 20:09 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-03-30 20:26 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acrYisNNAv2FEgXP@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pengyu@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome