From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F703D4114 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774948417; cv=none; b=rs7MuH4t8uL8MKAF7zQJGZcrb7XcggznXFENztfGN+ApC8aRg6ZdlRRAICSBDSWPPMosxWOMXgLqNKoxYz42PEuvZSiFVzTXFIyfPqnyz5+cBG+jbzMCx6Ad6mMkXrbZ0lEbp+oGvLCU4lPe5Cump/3baA9l3vWzciXokTP6rJ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774948417; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lC63+3sUkuGmMIn3swC0ELAj/tSffr946dwqjdWyo+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E/7EvIhDyCrtCenD/eubdemqx7JXpOrN6sxN5kklwmcj7BeiYIJUA0npniIjWJULysraud9/vAb2/wD3Q1mAhPH9KpEZifeJQWOfu5ezS+6Y0ZpAwem1UUQ1m8hb7fi3CE4yWR831/PMJH1Te7TegBBJq/CgQIU5Lb9ICl5eJhQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=c3SpUJpg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="c3SpUJpg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774948417; x=1806484417; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=lC63+3sUkuGmMIn3swC0ELAj/tSffr946dwqjdWyo+0=; b=c3SpUJpgozGrLoKfbKwRSYEraAEEC/DCh5N7AvYh5qDmkH+UyCp/LnEl HI1Gs58kcs2EaZnLfOYsg9D7Og/i3/0Wr+yIlFkaDDRXHwqWwF+URw9BJ U00js3o1dtU4KF4vk+yLr/7BWus+wBkVoJXNuKl1VSAsaLQwRzvnztWBb AR28Zrf7d6AsSKs1tE05apvbCng35H375Rjp8JSE6RSULVOMZimBiLGYs UmUzgfE0TLG0vC4QIFWliMI1860NBfdt0xLg1pnCJW4/KEzoYPcZFa6TD 9Z5hjoDc5iWWtRy9BQBDxllYsxiMe2ZLsAbqgC96c83nLHfm4Uh3ZQfiY A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mkSr+2ZJS2+GDQjoWiBk/w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: JT4RCglnQXumvkPOEo3bVg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11744"; a="93539570" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,151,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="93539570" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Mar 2026 02:13:36 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0TII4xq6RO6GYZnwxFNAgA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: u5KUgFyNTGiEUHocXIhMBw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,151,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="231125849" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.209]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Mar 2026 02:13:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:13:32 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Daniel Palmer Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, joerg@dorchain.net, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] parport: mfc3: Convert to a modern zorro driver Message-ID: References: <20260227101643.473010-1-daniel@thingy.jp> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 06:09:12PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 19:02, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Thank you for the review. It seems like the parport maintainer isn't > responding (Andy has some patches that haven't been reviewed or picked > up[0] too). > Is there a way to take this via the m68k tree because it only matters > for m68k or something? > > I have CC'd Linus, Greg K-H and Andy. After googling "LKML how to > escalate unresponsive maintainer" and not finding much. If this is > wrong, sorry for the spam. :) Become a new maintainer! But you can also send a patch changing MAINTAINERS database. > 0 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260122090601.2380747-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko