mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>, "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: fix use-after-free on unbind
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:20:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acvYGLESQ1kZYB2G@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acuI7MOEMmAgGwve@nsa>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 09:46:35AM +0100, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 11:22:10AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 04:58:40PM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > The DMA device lifetime can extend beyond the platform driver unbind if
> > > DMA channels are still referenced by client drivers. This leads to
> > > use-after-free when the devm-managed memory is freed on unbind but the
> > > DMA device callbacks still access it.
> > >
> > > Fix this by:
> > >  - Allocating axi_dmac with kzalloc_obj() instead of devm_kzalloc() so
> > > its lifetime is not tied to the platform device.
> > >  - Implementing the device_release callback that so that we can free
> > > the object when reference count gets to 0 (no users).
> > >  - Adding an 'unbound' flag protected by the vchan lock that is set
> > > during driver removal, preventing MMIO accesses after the device has been
> > > unbound.
> > >
> > > While at it, explicitly include spinlock.h given it was missing.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Not sure if it similar with
> > https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20250903-v6-16-topic-sdma-v1-9-ac7bab629e8b@pengutronix.de/
> >
> > It looks like miss device link between comsumer and provider.
>
> Well, it surely it's related. I mean, if we ensure the consumers are
> gone through devlinks and nothing is left behind, then this patch is basically unneeded.
>
> But, FWIW, my 2cents would also go into questioning if AUTOREMOVE is
> really want we want in every situation? Might be to harsh to assume that
> a DMA channel consumer is useless even if DMA is gone. Anyways, is there
> a v2 already? I would be interested in following this one...

This patch may be missed by vnod, I have asked vnod to check again. The
open question link to channel device or dma enginee device. I prefer link
to channel devices, so it support more advance's runtime pm management.

Frank
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > >  drivers/dma/dma-axi-dmac.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dma-axi-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/dma-axi-dmac.c
> > > index 127c3cf80a0e..70d3ad7e7d37 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dma-axi-dmac.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dma-axi-dmac.c
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > >
> > >  #include <dt-bindings/dma/axi-dmac.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -174,6 +175,8 @@ struct axi_dmac {
> > >
> > >  	struct dma_device dma_dev;
> > >  	struct axi_dmac_chan chan;
> > > +
> > > +	bool unbound;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static struct axi_dmac *chan_to_axi_dmac(struct axi_dmac_chan *chan)
> > > @@ -182,6 +185,11 @@ static struct axi_dmac *chan_to_axi_dmac(struct axi_dmac_chan *chan)
> > >  		dma_dev);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static struct axi_dmac *dev_to_axi_dmac(struct dma_device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	return container_of(dev, struct axi_dmac, dma_dev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static struct axi_dmac_chan *to_axi_dmac_chan(struct dma_chan *c)
> > >  {
> > >  	return container_of(c, struct axi_dmac_chan, vchan.chan);
> > > @@ -614,7 +622,12 @@ static int axi_dmac_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *c)
> > >  	LIST_HEAD(head);
> > >
> > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
> > > -	axi_dmac_write(dmac, AXI_DMAC_REG_CTRL, 0);
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Only allow the MMIO access if the device is live. Otherwise still
> > > +	 * go for freeing the descriptors.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (!dmac->unbound)
> > > +		axi_dmac_write(dmac, AXI_DMAC_REG_CTRL, 0);
> > >  	chan->next_desc = NULL;
> > >  	vchan_get_all_descriptors(&chan->vchan, &head);
> > >  	list_splice_tail_init(&chan->active_descs, &head);
> > > @@ -642,9 +655,12 @@ static void axi_dmac_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *c)
> > >  	if (chan->hw_sg)
> > >  		ctrl |= AXI_DMAC_CTRL_ENABLE_SG;
> > >
> > > -	axi_dmac_write(dmac, AXI_DMAC_REG_CTRL, ctrl);
> > > -
> > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
> > > +	if (dmac->unbound) {
> > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +	axi_dmac_write(dmac, AXI_DMAC_REG_CTRL, ctrl);
> > >  	if (vchan_issue_pending(&chan->vchan))
> > >  		axi_dmac_start_transfer(chan);
> > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chan->vchan.lock, flags);
> > > @@ -1184,6 +1200,14 @@ static int axi_dmac_detect_caps(struct axi_dmac *dmac, unsigned int version)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static void axi_dmac_release(struct dma_device *dma_dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct axi_dmac *dmac = dev_to_axi_dmac(dma_dev);
> > > +
> > > +	put_device(dma_dev->dev);
> > > +	kfree(dmac);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void axi_dmac_tasklet_kill(void *task)
> > >  {
> > >  	tasklet_kill(task);
> > > @@ -1194,16 +1218,27 @@ static void axi_dmac_free_dma_controller(void *of_node)
> > >  	of_dma_controller_free(of_node);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static void axi_dmac_disable(void *__dmac)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct axi_dmac *dmac = __dmac;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dmac->chan.vchan.lock, flags);
> > > +	dmac->unbound = true;
> > > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmac->chan.vchan.lock, flags);
> > > +	axi_dmac_write(dmac, AXI_DMAC_REG_CTRL, 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int axi_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct dma_device *dma_dev;
> > > -	struct axi_dmac *dmac;
> > > +	struct axi_dmac *__dmac;
> > >  	struct regmap *regmap;
> > >  	unsigned int version;
> > >  	u32 irq_mask = 0;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > -	dmac = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dmac), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +	struct axi_dmac *dmac __free(kfree) = kzalloc_obj(struct axi_dmac);
> > >  	if (!dmac)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > @@ -1251,6 +1286,7 @@ static int axi_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	dma_dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >  	dma_dev->src_addr_widths = BIT(dmac->chan.src_width);
> > >  	dma_dev->dst_addr_widths = BIT(dmac->chan.dest_width);
> > > +	dma_dev->device_release = axi_dmac_release;
> > >  	dma_dev->directions = BIT(dmac->chan.direction);
> > >  	dma_dev->residue_granularity = DMA_RESIDUE_GRANULARITY_DESCRIPTOR;
> > >  	dma_dev->max_sg_burst = 31; /* 31 SGs maximum in one burst */
> > > @@ -1285,12 +1321,21 @@ static int axi_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * From this point on, our dmac object has it's lifetime bounded with
> > > +	 * dma_dev. Will be freed when dma_dev refcount goes to 0. That means,
> > > +	 * no more automatic kfree(). Also note that dmac is now NULL so we
> > > +	 * need __dmac.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	__dmac = no_free_ptr(dmac);
> > > +	get_device(&pdev->dev);
> > > +
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * Put the action in here so it get's done before unregistering the DMA
> > >  	 * device.
> > >  	 */
> > >  	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, axi_dmac_tasklet_kill,
> > > -				       &dmac->chan.vchan.task);
> > > +				       &__dmac->chan.vchan.task);
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1304,13 +1349,18 @@ static int axi_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >
> > > -	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dmac->irq, axi_dmac_interrupt_handler,
> > > -			       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dmac);
> > > +	/* So that we can mark the device as unbound and disable it */
> > > +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, axi_dmac_disable, __dmac);
> > >  	if (ret)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >
> > > -	regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, dmac->base,
> > > -		 &axi_dmac_regmap_config);
> > > +	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, __dmac->irq, axi_dmac_interrupt_handler,
> > > +			       IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), __dmac);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, __dmac->base,
> > > +				       &axi_dmac_regmap_config);
> > >
> > >  	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(regmap);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.53.0
> > >

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27 16:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: Some memory related fixes Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-03-27 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dmaengine: Fix possuible use after free Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 15:15   ` Frank Li
2026-03-27 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: Properly free struct axi_dmac_desc Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 15:17   ` Frank Li
2026-03-27 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: fix use-after-free on unbind Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 15:22   ` Frank Li
2026-03-31  8:46     ` Nuno Sá
2026-03-31 14:20       ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-03-27 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: Defer freeing DMA descriptors Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 15:24   ` Frank Li
2026-03-31  8:53     ` Nuno Sá
2026-03-31 14:16       ` Frank Li
2026-03-31 15:21         ` Nuno Sá
2026-04-01 16:14           ` Nuno Sá
2026-04-01 22:27             ` Frank Li
2026-04-02 17:06               ` Nuno Sá

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acvYGLESQ1kZYB2G@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®