From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752620AbdLCT3O (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:29:14 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34530 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbdLCT3H (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:29:07 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 6A7566034D Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V3 09/29] drm/i915: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot() To: =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, David Airlie , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, open list , "open list:DRM DRIVERS" , Rodrigo Vivi , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1511801886-6753-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1511801886-6753-10-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20171128153051.GU10981@intel.com> <9046d23e-412d-9d9f-147f-a3bc6eea34fc@codeaurora.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 14:29:03 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9046d23e-412d-9d9f-147f-a3bc6eea34fc@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/2017 11:29 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 11/28/2017 10:30 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>> + dev_priv->bridge_dev = >>> + pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)); >> Maybe just pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) ? >> >> I guess if we want to be pedantic we could go for: >> >> bus = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus)->bus; >> pci_get_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) >> >> but I think the GPU should always be on the root bus, so the simpler >> form should be fine. >> > > All three of these should be correct. > > I'll use pci_get_slot(pdev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)) as you suggested. > Now that I think about this more, I think my version is a simpler change and does not introduce "new features" by assuming GPU and host to be on the same bus similar to the original code. Original code could have used pci_get_slot() too. Since all of them are correct, mine is slightly more correct; I'd like to keep mine. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.