From: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:21:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad725823-f4ef-904f-c04c-90a6aad43323@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb72e067-3f5f-1bac-dc9b-3abd9d7739a2@redhat.com>
On 1/11/23 8:58 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> On 1/11/23 16:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> This fixes a regression introduced by ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable
>> sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs"), where we
>> remove the sysfb when loading a driver for an unrelated pci device,
>> resulting in the user loosing their efifb console or similar.
>>
>> Note that in practice this only is a problem with the nvidia blob,
>> because that's the only gpu driver people might install which does not
>> come with an fbdev driver of it's own. For everyone else the real gpu
>> driver will restor a working console.
>
> restore
>
>>
>> Also note that in the referenced bug there's confusion that this same
>> bug also happens on amdgpu. But that was just another amdgpu specific
>> regression, which just happened to happen at roughly the same time and
>> with the same user-observable symptons. That bug is fixed now, see
>
> symptoms
>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216331#c15
>>
>> For the above reasons the cc: stable is just notionally, this patch
>> will need a backport and that's up to nvidia if they care enough.
>>
>
> Maybe adding a Fixes: ee7a69aa38d8 tag here too ?
>
>> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216303#c28
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19+ (if someone else does the backport)
>> ---
>> drivers/video/aperture.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> index ba565515480d..a1821d369bb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
>> @@ -321,15 +321,16 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
>>
>> primary = pdev == vga_default_device();
>>
>> + if (primary)
>> + sysfb_disable();
>> +
>> for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++bar) {
>> if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
>> continue;
>>
>> base = pci_resource_start(pdev, bar);
>> size = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
>> - ret = aperture_remove_conflicting_devices(base, size, name);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + aperture_detach_devices(base, size);
>
> Maybe mention in the commit message that you are doing this change, something like:
>
> "Instead of calling aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() to remove the conflicting
> devices, just call to aperture_detach_devices() to detach the device that matches
> the same PCI BAR / aperture range. Since the former is just a wrapper of the latter
> plus a sysfb_disable() call, and now that's done in this function but only for the
> primary devices"
>
> Patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Thanks Daniel and Javier!
I wasn't able to reproduce the original problem on my hybrid laptop
since it refuses to boot with the console on an external display, but I
was able to reproduce it by switching the configuration around: booting
with i915.modeset=0 and with an experimental version of nvidia-drm that
registers a framebuffer console. I verified that loading nvidia-drm
breaks the efi-firmware framebuffer on Intel on Arch's
linux-6.1.4-arch1-1 kernel and that applying this patch series fixes it. So
Tested-by: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
FWIW, the bug ought to be reproducible with i915.modeset=0 + any other
drm driver that registers a framebuffer.
-- Aaron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 15:41 [PATCH 01/11] drm/ast: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/gma500: " Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 9:04 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 9:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 10:24 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 10:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 12:15 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 15:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/aperture: Remove primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:49 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] video/aperture: use generic code to figure out the vga default device Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:59 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] video/aperture: Only kick vgacon when the pdev is decoding vga Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:03 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] staging/lynxfb: Use pci aperture helper Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:05 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] fbdev/radeon: use pci aperture helpers Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] fbdev/hyperv: " Daniel Vetter
2023-01-17 18:42 ` Dexuan Cui
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] video/aperture: Move vga handling to pci function Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] video/aperture: Drop primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:09 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:20 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 7:48 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:43 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-01-11 16:58 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-01-11 19:21 ` Aaron Plattner [this message]
2023-01-12 7:55 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 8:44 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-01-11 15:48 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/ast: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 17:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 9:41 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-04 14:45 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-18 0:53 ` Jammy Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad725823-f4ef-904f-c04c-90a6aad43323@nvidia.com \
--to=aplattner@nvidia.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®