mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: buckzhang1212 <buckzhang1212@yeah.net>,
	"llong@redhat.com" <llong@redhat.com>
Cc: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel…" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex:add MUTEX_CHCEK_INIT to detect uninitialized mutex lock
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:22:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad9f8b77-9435-44f6-b316-b6785c9f0089@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <377cba8b.2bd3a.19979cf5b04.Coremail.buckzhang1212@yeah.net>

On 9/23/25 11:40 PM, buckzhang1212 wrote:
> Hey Waiman
> Thank you for your reply.
> I totally agree with you that A mutex must be properly initialized 
> before it can be used.
> But my customer engineer often make the mistake like this in TP or 
> fingerprint driver.
> I want to warn this mistake at first because it can be used normally 
> mostly.
> when enable CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES,we can get more informations.
> This check has provided no additional value and it slows down the
> locking fast path.
> ---- how about move the warning to __mutex_lock_slowpath?
> Can you give me some advices?

As suggested by Peter, additional checks like that should only be 
enabled in the debug portion of the code (i.e. within 
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES or other debug kconfig option). The normal way we 
test the kernel patches is to build a debug kernel with all the 
appropriate debug options enabled and use it for testing purpose as 
performance isn't a concern. This enables all the debug code to be 
activated and check for correctness. Don't rely your testing just on the 
production kernel unless you are testing for some performance related 
metrics. Even then, both the debug and production kernels should be used.

Hope this help.

Cheers,
Longman



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24  2:25 buckzhang1212
2025-09-24  3:10 ` Waiman Long
2025-09-24  6:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]   ` <377cba8b.2bd3a.19979cf5b04.Coremail.buckzhang1212@yeah.net>
2025-09-24 14:22     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-09-24 16:15 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad9f8b77-9435-44f6-b316-b6785c9f0089@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=buckzhang1212@yeah.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®