Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Document MCQ register space for UFS

[Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>]

On 11-Aug-25 8:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 16:31, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> Document Multi-Circular Queue (MCQ) register space for
>> Qualcomm UFS controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml        | 16 ++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> index 6c6043d9809e..daf681b0e23b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -89,9 +89,13 @@ properties:
>>      maxItems: 2
>>  
>>    reg-names:
>> -    items:
>> -      - const: std
>> -      - const: ice
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: std
>> +          - const: ice
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: ufs_mem
>> +          - const: mcq
> 
> No. Why are you sending this? You have been Cc-ed here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250731-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-v2-3-53bb634bf95a@linaro.org/

Hi Krzysztof,

I understand I was Cc-ed on the patch thread you linked. However, if I send my patch on top of yours before it’s merged, the kernel bot might flag it due to missing base changes. Please let me know if you're okay with that — I can proceed with pushing my patch on top of yours.

Thanks,
Ram.


> 
> Above is neither correct nor aligned with what I told you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof