From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E8CC433FE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FF960EBB for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231365AbhKBOUW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:20:22 -0400 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.38]:51966 "EHLO alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230326AbhKBOUU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:20:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1635862665; x=1667398665; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RPgoEHvTBU8KNlt3EetYBZuJAehLk4kT7pCMgjtE7cU=; b=C3WAG7rw/WL7ZC05VZ4rNc9vYoKtD2/p/6RG/w6NxTsnuOOJQ4gMJbR2 O73q0FqscAlLxuQDD+zhz5II5h3s9e6RBA8PYCylUVQh0AJsC17mt5qlW 2smU2B/44JEFGagO1gshEHY33RGErAPI0Ld6ACLt59UdVU0U01UJl+7ph 0=; Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg05-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.145]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2021 07:17:44 -0700 X-QCInternal: smtphost Received: from nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.97.222]) by ironmsg05-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2021 07:17:44 -0700 Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) by nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.7; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:17:44 -0700 Received: from [10.110.22.220] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.922.7; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:17:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] software node: Skip duplicated software_node sysfs To: Heikki Krogerus , Andy Shevchenko CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Laurentiu Tudor , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20211101200346.16466-1-quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> From: Qian Cai Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 10:17:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/2/21 4:28 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > I'm actually not sure what is going on in this case, because this is > the ACPI enumerated BSW board, at least based on the ACPI ID? Yes, this is an ACPI-based server. > That board should not have the initial secondary fwnode assigned by > the time the dwc3 host driver is called. Heikki, what information would be helpful to figure it out? Is the full demsg useful here?