From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
To: Prathamesh Deshpande <prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
Alex Vesker <valex@mellanox.com>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh@mellanox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5: IPOIB, Fix QPN lookup race
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:18:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ade46454-e575-43e4-85aa-eeb5ad79408a@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030002241.8508-1-prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com>
On 30.10.26 01:22, Prathamesh Deshpande wrote:
> mlx5i_pkey_get_netdev() reads the QPN hash table without ht_lock,
> while mlx5i_pkey_del_qpn() removes entries under that lock and then
> frees them.
>
> PKEY child interfaces share the parent's RX resources, so RX lookups
> can overlap child removal and access a freed entry. A lookup for
> another QPN in the same bucket can also be affected.
>
I don't think that all these cases can happen. But I can see how a
CQE completion on the parent can read a pointer from the hash
bucket that just got deleted.
Please improve the commit message.
> Hold ht_lock during lookup and save node->netdev before unlocking.
>
Holding the spinlock in the datapath is not a good idea. AFAIU
using hlist RCU variants will be enough.
Thanks,
Dragos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 0:22 Prathamesh Deshpande
2026-10-30 0:29 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-30 11:18 ` Dragos Tatulea [this message]
2026-10-30 18:12 ` Prathamesh Deshpande
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ade46454-e575-43e4-85aa-eeb5ad79408a@nvidia.com \
--to=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=erezsh@mellanox.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=valex@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®