From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85AEC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9671E206BA for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728800AbfDPKMq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:12:46 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51404 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728436AbfDPKMq (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:12:46 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49E80D; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 03:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.42.238] (p8cg001049571a15.blr.arm.com [10.162.42.238]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DE703F68F; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 03:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory() To: David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, cpandya@codeaurora.org, arunks@codeaurora.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, osalvador@suse.de, cai@lca.pw, logang@deltatee.com, ira.weiny@intel.com References: <1555221553-18845-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1555221553-18845-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:42:38 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/15/2019 07:28 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 14.04.19 07:59, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Memory hot remove uses get_nid_for_pfn() while tearing down linked sysfs >> entries between memory block and node. It first checks pfn validity with >> pfn_valid_within() before fetching nid. With CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE config >> (arm64 has this enabled) pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid(). >> >> pfn_valid() is an arch implementation on arm64 (CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID) >> which scans all mapped memblock regions with memblock_is_map_memory(). This >> creates a problem in memory hot remove path which has already removed given >> memory range from memory block with memblock_[remove|free] before arriving >> at unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(). Hence get_nid_for_pfn() returns -1 >> skipping subsequent sysfs_remove_link() calls leaving node <-> memory block >> sysfs entries as is. Subsequent memory add operation hits BUG_ON() because >> of existing sysfs entries. >> >> [ 62.007176] NUMA: Unknown node for memory at 0x680000000, assuming node 0 >> [ 62.052517] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 62.053211] kernel BUG at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1143! >> [ 62.053868] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP >> [ 62.054589] Modules linked in: >> [ 62.054999] CPU: 19 PID: 3275 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.1.0-rc2-00004-g28cea40b2683 #41 >> [ 62.056274] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) >> [ 62.057166] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO) >> [ 62.058083] pc : add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8 >> [ 62.058961] lr : add_memory_resource+0x10c/0x1d8 >> [ 62.059842] sp : ffff0000168b3ce0 >> [ 62.060477] x29: ffff0000168b3ce0 x28: ffff8005db546c00 >> [ 62.061501] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 >> [ 62.062509] x25: ffff0000111ef000 x24: ffff0000111ef5d0 >> [ 62.063520] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000006bfffffff >> [ 62.064540] x21: 00000000ffffffef x20: 00000000006c0000 >> [ 62.065558] x19: 0000000000680000 x18: 0000000000000024 >> [ 62.066566] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 >> [ 62.067579] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8005e412e890 >> [ 62.068588] x13: ffff8005d6b105d8 x12: 0000000000000000 >> [ 62.069610] x11: ffff8005d6b10490 x10: 0000000000000040 >> [ 62.070615] x9 : ffff8005e412e898 x8 : ffff8005e412e890 >> [ 62.071631] x7 : ffff8005d6b105d8 x6 : ffff8005db546c00 >> [ 62.072640] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000002 >> [ 62.073654] x3 : ffff8005d7049480 x2 : 0000000000000002 >> [ 62.074666] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000ffffffef >> [ 62.075685] Process bash (pid: 3275, stack limit = 0x00000000d754280f) >> [ 62.076930] Call trace: >> [ 62.077411] add_memory_resource+0x1cc/0x1d8 >> [ 62.078227] __add_memory+0x70/0xa8 >> [ 62.078901] probe_store+0xa4/0xc8 >> [ 62.079561] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 >> [ 62.080270] sysfs_kf_write+0x40/0x58 >> [ 62.080992] kernfs_fop_write+0xcc/0x1d8 >> [ 62.081744] __vfs_write+0x18/0x40 >> [ 62.082400] vfs_write+0xa4/0x1b0 >> [ 62.083037] ksys_write+0x5c/0xc0 >> [ 62.083681] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 >> [ 62.084432] el0_svc_handler+0x88/0x100 >> [ 62.085177] el0_svc+0x8/0xc >> >> Re-ordering arch_remove_memory() with memblock_[free|remove] solves the >> problem on arm64 as pfn_valid() behaves correctly and returns positive >> as memblock for the address range still exists. arch_remove_memory() >> removes applicable memory sections from zone with __remove_pages() and >> tears down kernel linear mapping. Removing memblock regions afterwards >> is safe because there is no other memblock (bootmem) allocator user that >> late. So nobody is going to allocate from the removed range just to blow >> up later. Also nobody should be using the bootmem allocated range else >> we wouldn't allow to remove it. So reordering is indeed safe. >> >> Acked-by: Michal Hocko >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand >> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual >> --- >> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >> index 0082d69..71d0d79 100644 >> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c >> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >> @@ -1872,11 +1872,10 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) >> >> /* remove memmap entry */ >> firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM"); >> + arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); >> memblock_free(start, size); >> memblock_remove(start, size); >> >> - arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); >> - >> try_offline_node(nid); >> >> mem_hotplug_done(); >> > > This will conflict with a patch I posted, but should be easy > to fix. We should stick to the reverse order in which things are added, > which is what you are doing here. > > commit 5af92d15e179557143d54bde477f7e45fc5c0fca > Author: David Hildenbrand > Date: Wed Apr 10 11:02:26 2019 +1000 > > mm/memory_hotplug: release memory resource after arch_remove_memory() > Got it. My current WIP branch is on the following. We should be able to fix it during merge. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core