mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuto Ohnuki <ytohnuki@amazon.com>
To: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: check directory data block header padding in scrub
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:26:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adky4hw3YdX06wEF@c889f3b07a0a.ant.amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adbKxVodbqAdM9Ol@dread>

On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 07:38:13AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> This seems .... a bit of a hack.
> 
> For simplicity, performance and long term maintenance of the code,
> we should zero the whole directory block header region
> unconditionally. This means we don't have to change the dir3 blk header
> initialisation code (except to remove the zeroing), we can remove
> the manual bestfree zeroing loop, all the padding (implicit and
> explicit) will be zeroed, and we know that any future
> changes to the dir header structure will automatically be
> initialised to zero....
> 
> i.e.
> 	/* initialise the whole directory header region to zero */
> 	memset(bp->b_addr, 0, geo->data_entry_offset);

Thank you for the valuable feedback. I'll rework this patch
along these lines.

> You don't need endian conversion on a value of 0.

Understood. I'll fix this, same as the other patch.

> Why only update scrub? Why not add code that unconditionally
> sets the padding to 0 on directory data block writes? e.g. in
> xfs_dir3_data_write_verify() alongside the writing of the LSN into
> the header?
> 
> That way any directory that is modified ends up having the padding
> zeroed at runtime with no additional cost, and so filesystems will
> slowly correct themselves over time without needing to run repair...
> 
> -Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> dgc@kernel.org

Good point, thanks again. I'm also looking into adding self-healing in
xfs_dir3_data_write_verify() and may split the changes into a series 
for easier review.

Thanks,
Yuto



Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, 38 avenue John F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B186284

Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL, Irish Branch, One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland, branch registration number 908705




      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08 17:27 Yuto Ohnuki
2026-04-08 21:38 ` Dave Chinner
2026-04-10 17:26   ` Yuto Ohnuki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adky4hw3YdX06wEF@c889f3b07a0a.ant.amazon.com \
    --to=ytohnuki@amazon.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®