From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: "Balbir Singh" <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
"Yang Yang" <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
"Wang Yaxin" <wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>,
"xu xin" <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>,
"Kun Jiang" <jiang.kun2@zte.com.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] delayacct: fix uapi timespec64 definition
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 21:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae0593b5-ead8-4b9f-b4c5-331d81b564f3@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202123754.1bf674cd3b58ce0cb2cfa006@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Feb 2, 2026, at 21:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> /*v17: delay max timestamp record*/
>> - struct timespec64 cpu_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 blkio_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 swapin_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 freepages_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 thrashing_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 compact_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 wpcopy_delay_max_ts;
>> - struct timespec64 irq_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec cpu_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec blkio_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec swapin_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec freepages_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec thrashing_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec compact_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec wpcopy_delay_max_ts;
>> + struct __kernel_timespec irq_delay_max_ts;
>> } __uapi_arch_align;
>
> There's no __uapi_arch_align here in any tree I looked at?
My mistake, that was a remnant of a work-in-progress
series that I used to detect unintended padding in uapi
structures.
Thanks for fixing up the patch and applying the correct
version.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 9:59 Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-02 13:08 ` wang.yaxin
2026-02-02 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2026-02-02 20:47 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-02-13 8:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae0593b5-ead8-4b9f-b4c5-331d81b564f3@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=jiang.kun2@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®