From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=117.135.210.3 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793842989; b=QHyNr1hXORRJzRNtYYZ+rKsD6zL6hemAgKcaI9OcZ+RO6AJdh6TSXJ8tQtixeH5DunEw KAf6YEtD458AQMpMG/Glom6GWunUdiGUKwhYr01bJOUsM9T6FzceOEUvkJ/jonUq1AwpR V+vEEUCbwDNfnj/euBU+bzwtRyT3mpEvbizCqwNHCAOs+QfF/vcYDBjnLkR+BwrKwfseX LN7WGWJDHah6YAjQGSrCKZKhIVoNwnJbZip1ltAR6rFLdDHM3avC+EZw2wbQMsJXIxzl4 zLFdJZ7FzE33gU+ddc8TNb+pGvqHr+vIjiAHExDnot8IyaEIh0Jo9wqjgM0qX/N+Ynw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793842989; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent: Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Content-Language:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-CM-TRANSID: X-Coremail-Antispam:X-CM-SenderInfo; bh=4BSqxRTgSb3vt/CKXrrFj6KaX5f+yk4qmxSo/6uB+PI=; b=4CBf/kZDcsiqi08fjthJHmbtbG9lEmsF8IZJbyh6Csn2v4BZxz9maIlCHEdJgrwZan/u CZgMtIf2yLLkfHrDqm7apP+c9h97p/ceJXa9Q+qA5wcwafZ86wXFkBTA3eOnxSYKdIMM1 HPKisRbgVMlk2DGpQ9tnrpYOPIUETeu+zyQGBQ/h1+BdKYgD7qmTcPyQs54gilqlitUsP WoFkReXzlQkzG44JPysWHgVmFTw+mcErNf3YKhUgueaLAMpkQLW7sZSnCS0+YSVtNWK4v y1ocmSrFskBna3vif1sLXrFHfClVMUkoCc5hu9lWeekzDUq+bJCPx1/mcC23uzA5BYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=s110527 header.b=dVWoeXXm; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=117.135.210.3 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D085E606A31B; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 01:43:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org D085E606A31B Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=s110527 header.b=dVWoeXXm DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=4BSqxRTgSb3vt/CKXrrFj6KaX5f+yk4qmxSo/6uB+PI=; b=dVWoeXXmkS6ZuUMhVbBIA90KZzRWEgOUM3BiNEE7K6NBfeluWjygDEWevKbB8Z WoEIFb0AjUl3QB4H5FWmaGGUSKMwscaokWFKVNTIDflZKXViboExCQTHmUEI3RWi LO5OFzP3zACmHPcc0SEXlXjwDkp5vOvCuVy5qyhOeR0Ak= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 09:41:50 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: avoid secs-to-jiffies overflow in SIP helper To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Florian Westphal , Phil Sutter , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Patrick McHardy , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20261104085925.773471-1-l1138897701@163.com> <179378310288.488859.5501372329923288019@kernel.org> From: luoqing Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <179378310288.488859.5501372329923288019@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wD3X6fi3utqiL+2FA--.37895S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7CFW3ArykCF18Jr48KrWktFb_yoW8uw15pa y3K397AF98JFyFkF4vvw4Iq3WrtrZ3GF4UWr1UKry0v3Z8CFy8trsFgr4kCa4DGFyxJ3W0 qrWUKrn8ZFyqvaDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0zR573PUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: jorrjmiyzxliqr6rljoofrz/xtbC+gWGymrr3uU8QwAA32 Hi, Thank you for the reminder. I appreciate the automated check and the time taken to review this series. I would like to provide the missing information below. I apologize that it was not sufficiently clear in the original commit messages. - How the issue was discovered:   The issue was noticed while I was studying this module with AI-assisted   learning. The AI assistance helped me spot a suspicious code path, and I   then verified it through manual code analysis / code inspection. It was   not hit in production or during development, was not reported by syzbot,   and was not found by an automated static analysis tool scan. The final   conclusion is based on my own manual code analysis. - Whether the issue was actually triggered:   The issue has not been triggered in practice. It is currently a   theoretical issue found by code inspection, so there are no stack traces   or error messages to report. I understand this is different from a   reproduced failure. I am not reposting the series just to add this information. Please take this reply into account during your review. If another revision is needed for other reasons, I will include this information in the commit messages then. Thanks again for pointing this out. Best regards, luoqing -------- 原始消息 -------- > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during > development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static > analysis tool scan. > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain.