From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754130AbeEaIfj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 31 May 2018 04:35:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pl0-f67.google.com ([209.85.160.67]:36430 "EHLO
        mail-pl0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754034AbeEaIff (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 31 May 2018 04:35:35 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKINOD9HVd6iRYxCNbFcXm2hUjj4L0HCOkgybcKL2uM5XMn1iKuMkrP7AwS4FrcRQZ54hmqPlg==
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, qing.huang@oracle.com,
        tariqt@mellanox.com, haakon.bugge@oracle.com, yanjun.zhu@oracle.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com
References: <20180523232246.20445-1-qing.huang@oracle.com>
 <20180525.102321.858995452200286788.davem@davemloft.net>
 <7a353b65-6b7f-1aee-1c48-e83c8e02f693@gmail.com>
 <0e11e0fc-6ccf-aa93-9c4f-b9eae1b90643@gmail.com>
 <cdf0d1a9-378a-8b09-544e-a4918acb57fe@gmail.com>
 <20180531065405.GH15278@dhcp22.suse.cz>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ae114f01-4b09-bb1c-fb92-6152486a896f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 04:35:31 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180531065405.GH15278@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 05/31/2018 02:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 29-05-18 23:49:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/29/2018 11:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And I will add this simple fix, this really should address your initial concern much better.
>>>
>>> @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_icm_pages(struct scatterlist *mem, int order,
>>>  {
>>>         struct page *page;
>>>  
>>> +       if (order)
>>> +               gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
>>
>>     and also      gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
> 
> JFTR the latter one makes __GFP_NORETRY pointless. Non sleeping allocations
> are not retrying.

Hi Michal

Since when this rule is applied ?

These GFP flags change all the time, I suggest mm experts to cleanup existing call sites ?

I merely copied/pasted from alloc_skb_with_frags() :/

Thanks !