From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
To: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devarsht@ti.com, praneeth@ti.com,
h-shenoy@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com, jyri.sarha@iki.fi,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/tidss: Power up attached PM domains on probe
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 16:18:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae2b549f-1231-405b-ac7d-cc3df8a1dbef@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107174525.1702585-3-s-jain1@ti.com>
Hi,
On 07/01/2026 19:45, Swamil Jain wrote:
> From: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
>
> Some SoC's such as AM62P have dedicated power domains
> for OLDI which need to be powered on separately along
> with display controller.
>
> So during driver probe, power up all attached PM domains
> enumerated in devicetree node for DSS.
>
> This also prepares base to add display support for AM62P.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
> [j-choudhary@ti.com: fix PM call sequence causing kernel crash in OLDI]
> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swamil Jain <s-jain1@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.h | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c
> index 1c8cc18bc53c..33a10fba4325 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/aperture.h>
>
> #include <drm/clients/drm_client_setup.h>
> @@ -107,6 +108,68 @@ static const struct drm_driver tidss_driver = {
> .minor = 0,
> };
>
> +static int tidss_detach_pm_domains(struct tidss_device *tidss)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (tidss->num_domains <= 1)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tidss->num_domains; i++) {
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tidss->pd_link[i]))
> + device_link_del(tidss->pd_link[i]);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tidss->pd_dev[i]))
> + dev_pm_domain_detach(tidss->pd_dev[i], true);
> + tidss->pd_dev[i] = NULL;
> + tidss->pd_link[i] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
This should be void, especially as you don't even check the return value
below.
> +
> +static int tidss_attach_pm_domains(struct tidss_device *tidss)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = tidss->dev;
> + int i;
> + int ret;
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
You should try to order these lines from longest to the shortest (not
possible for every line).
> +
> + tidss->num_domains = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
> + "#power-domain-cells");
> +
> + tidss->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, tidss->num_domains,
> + sizeof(*tidss->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tidss->pd_dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + tidss->pd_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, tidss->num_domains,
> + sizeof(*tidss->pd_link), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tidss->pd_link)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tidss->num_domains; i++) {
> + tidss->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
> + if (IS_ERR(tidss->pd_dev[i])) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(tidss->pd_dev[i]);
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
> + tidss->pd_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, tidss->pd_dev[i],
> + DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
> + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
> + if (!tidss->pd_link[i]) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +fail:
> + tidss_detach_pm_domains(tidss);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int tidss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -129,15 +192,21 @@ static int tidss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> spin_lock_init(&tidss->irq_lock);
>
> + ret = tidss_attach_pm_domains(tidss);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to attach power domains\n");
> +
> ret = dispc_init(tidss);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize dispc: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to initialize dispc\n");
> + goto err_detach_pm_domains;
> }
>
> ret = tidss_oldi_init(tidss);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to init OLDI\n");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to init OLDI\n");
> + goto err_oldi_deinit;
This doesn't look right.
Tomi
> + }
>
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> @@ -203,8 +272,12 @@ static int tidss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>
> +err_oldi_deinit:
> tidss_oldi_deinit(tidss);
>
> +err_detach_pm_domains:
> + tidss_detach_pm_domains(tidss);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -232,6 +305,8 @@ static void tidss_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* devm allocated dispc goes away with the dev so mark it NULL */
> dispc_remove(tidss);
>
> + tidss_detach_pm_domains(tidss);
> +
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s done\n", __func__);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.h
> index e1c1f41d8b4b..6625b989b815 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_drv.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ struct tidss_device {
> /* protects the irq masks field and irqenable/irqstatus registers */
> spinlock_t irq_lock;
> dispc_irq_t irq_mask; /* enabled irqs */
> +
> + int num_domains; /* Count of PM domains to be handled */
> + struct device **pd_dev;
> + struct device_link **pd_link;
> };
>
> #define to_tidss(__dev) container_of(__dev, struct tidss_device, ddev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 17:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add Display support for AM62P SoC Swamil Jain
2026-01-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add am62p dss compatible Swamil Jain
2026-01-08 8:51 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-14 10:41 ` Michael Walle
2026-01-16 10:08 ` Swamil Jain
2026-01-15 16:54 ` Swamil Jain
2026-01-16 10:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/tidss: Power up attached PM domains on probe Swamil Jain
2026-01-09 14:18 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2026-01-15 19:55 ` Swamil Jain
2026-01-14 10:25 ` Michael Walle
2026-01-07 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm: tidss: tidss_drv: Add support for AM62P display subsystem Swamil Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae2b549f-1231-405b-ac7d-cc3df8a1dbef@ideasonboard.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aradhya.bhatia@linux.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=h-shenoy@ti.com \
--cc=jyri.sarha@iki.fi \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=praneeth@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-jain1@ti.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®