From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9E7C4360C for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88CC206C0 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728130AbfJHPsi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:48:38 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39886 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725908AbfJHPsi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:48:38 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26761570; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.194.37] (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 669A03F6C4; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: rework load_balance To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Phil Auld , Srikar Dronamraju , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Hillf Danton References: <1568878421-12301-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1568878421-12301-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <31cac0c1-98e4-c70e-e156-51a70813beff@arm.com> <20191008141642.GQ2294@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20191008153002.GA21999@linaro.org> From: Valentin Schneider Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:48:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191008153002.GA21999@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/10/2019 16:30, Vincent Guittot wrote: [...] > > This is how I plan to get ride of the problem: > + if (busiest->group_weight == 1 || sds->prefer_sibling) { > + unsigned int nr_diff = busiest->sum_h_nr_running; > + /* > + * When prefer sibling, evenly spread running tasks on > + * groups. > + */ > + env->migration_type = migrate_task; > + lsub_positive(&nr_diff, local->sum_h_nr_running); > + env->imbalance = nr_diff >> 1; > + return; > + } > I think this wants a /* Local could have more tasks than busiest */ atop the lsub, otherwise yeah that ought to work.