mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Save AMR/IAMR when switching tasks
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 13:38:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aebab2f0-a962-68ed-b655-84a3e87f2c7d@sholland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89049105-64fc-8d5b-d090-2841064786d1@csgroup.eu>

On 9/17/22 03:16, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 16/09/2022 à 07:05, Samuel Holland a écrit :
>> With CONFIG_PREEMPT=y (involuntary preemption enabled), it is possible
>> to switch away from a task inside copy_{from,to}_user. This left the CPU
>> with userspace access enabled until after the next IRQ or privilege
>> level switch, when AMR/IAMR got reset to AMR_KU[AE]P_BLOCKED. Then, when
>> switching back to the original task, the userspace access would fault:
> 
> This is not supposed to happen. You never switch away from a task 
> magically. Task switch will always happen in an interrupt, that means 
> copy_{from,to}_user() get interrupted.

That makes sense, the interrupt handler is responsible for saving the
KUAP status. It looks like neither DEFINE_INTERRUPT_HANDLER_RAW nor any
of its users (performance_monitor_exception(), do_slb_fault()) do that.
Yet they still call one of the interrupt_return variants, which restores
the status from the stack.

> Whenever an interrupt is taken, kuap_save_amr_and_lock() macro is used 
> to save KUAP status into the stack then lock KUAP access. At interrupt 
> exit, kuap_kernel_restore() macro or function is used to restore KUAP 
> access from the stack. At the time the task switch happens, KUAP access 
> is expected to be locked. During task switch, the stack is switched so 
> the KUAP status is taken back from the new task's stack.

What if another task calls schedule() from kernel process context, and
the scheduler switches to a task that had been preempted inside
copy_{from,to}_user()? Then there is no interrupt involved, and I don't
see where kuap_kernel_restore() would get called.

> Your fix suggests that there is some path where the KUAP status is not 
> properly saved and/or restored. Did you try running with 
> CONFIG_PPC_KUAP_DEBUG ? It should warn whenever a KUAP access is left 
> unlocked.
> 
>>
>>    Kernel attempted to write user page (3fff7ab68190) - exploit attempt? (uid: 65536)
>>    ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>    Bug: Write fault blocked by KUAP!
>>    WARNING: CPU: 56 PID: 4939 at arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c:228 ___do_page_fault+0x7b4/0xaa0
>>    CPU: 56 PID: 4939 Comm: git Tainted: G        W         5.19.8-00005-gba424747260d #1
>>    NIP:  c0000000000555e4 LR: c0000000000555e0 CTR: c00000000079d9d0
>>    REGS: c00000008f507370 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W          (5.19.8-00005-gba424747260d)
>>    MSR:  9000000000021033 <SF,HV,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28042222  XER: 20040000
>>    CFAR: c000000000123780 IRQMASK: 3
>>    NIP [c0000000000555e4] ___do_page_fault+0x7b4/0xaa0
>>    LR [c0000000000555e0] ___do_page_fault+0x7b0/0xaa0
>>    Call Trace:
>>    [c00000008f507610] [c0000000000555e0] ___do_page_fault+0x7b0/0xaa0 (unreliable)
>>    [c00000008f5076c0] [c000000000055938] do_page_fault+0x68/0x130
>>    [c00000008f5076f0] [c000000000008914] data_access_common_virt+0x194/0x1f0
>>    --- interrupt: 300 at __copy_tofrom_user_base+0x9c/0x5a4
> 
> ...
> 
>>
>> Fix this by saving and restoring the kernel-side AMR/IAMR values when
>> switching tasks.
> 
> As explained above, KUAP access should be locked at that time, so saving 
> and restoring it should not have any effect. If it does, it means 
> something goes wrong somewhere else.
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 890274c2dc4c ("powerpc/64s: Implement KUAP for Radix MMU")
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
>> ---
>> I have no idea if this is the right change to make, and it could be
>> optimized, but my system has been stable with this patch for 5 days now.
>>
>> Without the patch, I hit the bug every few minutes when my load average
>> is <1, and I hit it immediately if I try to do a parallel kernel build.
> 
> Great, then can you make a try with CONFIG_PPC_KUAP_DEBUG ?

Yes, I will try this out in the next few days.

Regards,
Samuel


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-17 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16  5:05 Samuel Holland
2022-09-17  8:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-17 18:38   ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2022-09-18  8:21     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-19 12:37   ` Michael Ellerman
2022-09-19 13:39     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-21 13:00       ` Michael Ellerman
2022-09-21  3:33     ` Samuel Holland
2022-09-21  5:17       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-10-26  4:27         ` Samuel Holland
2022-11-14 12:14           ` Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aebab2f0-a962-68ed-b655-84a3e87f2c7d@sholland.org \
    --to=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®