From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932179AbXCPHus (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:50:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932244AbXCPHus (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:50:48 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:35689 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932179AbXCPHur (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:50:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hxGI/rr7FjefxfwuM/upB4J27reguzUNDqqhC9cDbTAD/Ba0kLM/mTehK/1y/x9QBbW31JrrYrM3OnJCZcRe4bfMdiyjdJNwK26LBr94dlgumP5bPc2/k8I3iCmZ14BKcbDT+kwx1/jXk+ZhBan63PfYoVu9GXVu6s7dtXq0DhM= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:50:46 +0900 From: "Magnus Damm" To: Horms Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH 1/1] Allow i386 crash kernels to handle x86_64 dumps Cc: "Vivek Goyal" , fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ian Campbell" In-Reply-To: <20070316071031.GB6689@verge.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1173891609.8591.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070315045536.GA6766@in.ibm.com> <20070315050754.GB22329@verge.net.au> <20070315054726.GC6766@in.ibm.com> <1173961378.8591.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070315132616.GH6766@in.ibm.com> <20070315234807.GB10861@verge.net.au> <20070316032230.GC10515@in.ibm.com> <20070316071031.GB6689@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/16/07, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:52:30AM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > So it will now be left to the user. If he tries to kexec to a 64bit kernel > > on a machine not supporting 32bit extensions, then kexec will not give > > any advance warning. > > I feel comfortable with that. Well for now anyway. > But I think that Magnus has other ideas. I don't mind switching back and forth between 32-bit and 64-bit for plain kexec, especially if we can validate that the kernel we load will use an instruction set that is supported. But for kdump, switching between 32-bit and 64-bit kernels is just another new dimension in the already too complex kdump matrix IMO. I think more focus should be put on fixing up bugs in kexec-tools than adding new features. / magnus