From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 8)
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:40:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30907072140y7dd3b4c7ge7cb0b750bef3226@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907072222210.13052-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Alan Stern<stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> > I've now jumped from v5 to v8 and I feel that the code is getting
>> > cleaner and cleaner. Very nice.
>>
>> That's mostly thanks to Alan.
>
> I haven't had time yet to look through the new code. Things have been
> very busy.
>
>> > Issue 1:
>> > ------------
>> > Device drivers which do not perform any hardware access in probe()
>> > work fine. During software setup in probe() the runtime pm code is
>> > initialized with the following:
>> >
>> > + pm_suspend_ignore_children(&dev->dev, true);
>> > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&dev->dev);
>> > + pm_runtime_enable(&dev->dev);
>> >
>> > Before accessing hardware I perform:
>> > + pm_runtime_resume(pd->dev);
>> >
>> > When done with the hardware I do:
>> > + pm_runtime_suspend(pd->dev);
>> >
>> > Not so complicated. Am I supposed to initialize something else as well?
>
> No, that's all you need.
Ok, thank you!
>> > All good with the code above, but there seem to be some issue with how
>> > usage_count is counted up and down and when runtime_disabled is set:
>> >
>> > 1. pm_runtime_init(): usage_count = 1, runtime_disabled = true
>> > 2. driver_probe_device(): pm_runtime_get_sync()
>> > 3. pm_runtime_get_sync(): usage_count = 2
>> > 4. device driver probe(): pm_runtime_enable()
>> > 5. pm_runtime_enable(): usage_count = 1
>> > 6. driver_probe_device(): pm_runtime_put()
>> > 7. pm_runtime_put(): usage_count = 0
>> >
>> > I expect runtime_disabled = false in 7.
>
> Wasn't it? It should have been set to false in step 4 and remained
> that way.
I may misunderstand, but in v8 won't the pm_runtime_enable() function
do a atomic_dec_test() where the counter value will go from 2 to 1 in
the case above? This would mean that atomic_dec_test() returns false
so runtime_disabled is never modified.
Thanks for your feedback,
/ magnus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-08 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-06 0:52 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-07 15:12 ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-07 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 2:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 4:40 ` Magnus Damm [this message]
2009-07-08 14:26 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 17:50 ` [update][RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 9) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 5:45 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce core framework for run-time PM of I/O devices (rev. 8) Magnus Damm
2009-07-08 19:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 19:42 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-08 21:09 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-08 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-09 2:52 ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-09 13:48 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-09 15:31 ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-09 21:56 ` [linux-pm] " Mahalingam, Nithish
2009-07-11 11:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-07-12 2:05 ` Mahalingam, Nithish
2009-07-13 1:42 ` Magnus Damm
2009-07-09 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec7e5c30907072140y7dd3b4c7ge7cb0b750bef3226@mail.gmail.com \
--to=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®