From: "Mateusz Berezecki" <mateuszb@gmail.com>
To: "Benjamin LaHaise" <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: memory range R/W triggered breakpoints in kernel ?
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:31:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aec8d6fc0603051531o622d04bdjf2993729b0b946ca@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060305231654.GB20768@kvack.org>
Hello Benjamin
On 3/6/06, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> > I was thinking about writing some memory R/W access monitor. The only
> > concern I'm
> > having is whether it is doable, or are there any already existing and
> > working solutions like
> > that for Linux?
>
> Most CPUs implement memory breakpoints of some sort, although they're
> usually limited to specific address instead of ranges. See gdb's
> watch/awatch/rwatch commands.
Yes but again this is userspace. I was thinking about solution used
back in the old days in SoftICE kernel level debugger.
It had a BPR command (breakpoint on range) which could monitor
up to 400000 bytes of memory range. Unfortunately for me this command
works in very old versions of _that_ other OS.
>
> > which was read/written from certain address. Afterwards the whole page
> > would be marked as non present again.
>
> Use mprotect() and do it in userspace by catching SIGSEGV. Doing it for
> the kernel is non-trivial and will hit upon arch specific issues like
> double fault handlers. Given that the same sort of debugging can be done
> in userspace with UML and gdb, there isn't terribly much incentive to do
> the work to make something like this happen.
I thought about UML or maybe even playing with Xen would be better (is
host kernel
transparent to Xen ? ie. does Xen have access to the same hardware as
host kernel?)
but in the end I'd go for kernel page fault handler anyways.
M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-05 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-05 17:00 Mateusz Berezecki
2006-03-05 23:16 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-05 23:31 ` Mateusz Berezecki [this message]
2006-03-05 23:32 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-06 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aec8d6fc0603051531o622d04bdjf2993729b0b946ca@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mateuszb@gmail.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®