From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751285AbeDDRXG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:23:06 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55050 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbeDDRXF (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:23:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: restore READ_ONCE() C++ compatibility To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo References: <20180404163445.16492-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <7fb04d1a-79a9-0896-577b-193458e1cd48@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180404171805.kc3ldesmn2f2pjct@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> From: Sandipan Das Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:52:56 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180404171805.kc3ldesmn2f2pjct@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18040417-0020-0000-0000-0000040E1473 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18040417-0021-0000-0000-000042A2249E Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-04-04_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804040174 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/04/2018 10:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:43:16PM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> On 04/04/2018 10:04 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> >>> Zhijian, Sandipan, does this patch work for you? >>> >> >> Yes it does. Thanks for the fix. > > Great! Can I take that as a Tested-by? > Sure. - Sandipan