mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, feng.wu@intel.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:00:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af052add-55c9-d314-3d21-ac32e2cfbb82@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161103150356.GE7771@potion>



On 03/11/2016 16:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-11-03 14:30+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 26/10/2016 21:59, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> 2016-10-14 20:21+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> Calling apic_find_highest_irr results in IRR being scanned twice,
>>>> once in vmx_sync_pir_from_irr and once in apic_search_irr.  Change
>>>> sync_pir_from_irr to do the RVI write and kvm_apic_update_irr to
>>>> compute the new RVI on the fly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>>
>> Nope, this breaks nested VMX exit on external interrupt.  For now I'm
>> testing only patch 1 and will push that one only to kvm/next.
> 
> Hm, does it also happen with this change?

Probably not but I wanted to understand why. :)

Paolo

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 4b20f7304b9c..6be110e53e9e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>  	void (*set_virtual_x2apic_mode)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool set);
>  	void (*set_apic_access_page_addr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t hpa);
>  	void (*deliver_posted_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
> -	void (*sync_pir_to_irr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +	int (*sync_pir_to_irr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	int (*set_tss_addr)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int addr);
>  	int (*get_tdp_level)(void);
>  	u64 (*get_mt_mask)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool is_mmio);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f8157a36ab09..ffa541d38343 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -4383,9 +4383,9 @@ static void svm_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap)
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> -static void svm_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static int svm_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	return;
> +	return -1; // XXX
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index f272ccfddc48..2211e1774733 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8493,17 +8493,15 @@ static void vmx_hwapic_irr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> -	int max_irr;
>  
>  	if (!pi_test_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
>  		return;
>  
>  	pi_clear_on(&vmx->pi_desc);
> -	max_irr = kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
> -	vmx_hwapic_irr_update(vcpu, max_irr);
> +	return kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vmx->pi_desc.pir);
>  }
>  
>  static void vmx_apicv_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 20d572c18293..e8789f3a9bfd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6675,7 +6675,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * notified with kvm_vcpu_kick.
>  		 */
>  		if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
> -			kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu);
> +			kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu));
>  	}
>  
>  	if (vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE || vcpu->requests
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-03 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-14 18:21 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: cleanup and minimal speedup for APICv Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: avoid atomic operations on APICv vmentry Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:50   ` Nadav Amit
2016-10-14 18:56     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 19:44       ` Nadav Amit
2016-10-15  7:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-16  2:29           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-19 11:45             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-10-26 21:50               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-16  3:21   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-17 11:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 19:53   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-26 21:42     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-27 16:44       ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-27 16:51         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-27 17:06           ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-28  9:39             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-28 22:04               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice " Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-18  6:04   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-10-26 19:59   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 13:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 13:53       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-11-03 16:01         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 15:03       ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 16:00         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-11-03 18:07           ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 18:18             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-03 18:29               ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-03 20:16                 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-11-04  9:38                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt injection Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:05   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: remove unnecessary sync_pir_to_irr Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:28   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-14 18:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: vmx: clear pending interrupts on KVM_SET_LAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-26 20:08   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-10-26 21:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: cleanup and minimal speedup for APICv Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af052add-55c9-d314-3d21-ac32e2cfbb82@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome